Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JCLCX vs PACAX
JCLCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JCLCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv C
Price$12.38
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.27
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets575.59M
JCLCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JCLCX vs. PACAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JCLCX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JCLCX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. PACAX (576M). PACAX pays higher dividends than JCLCX: PACAX (3.40) vs JCLCX (2.96). JCLCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JCLCX (20 years) vs PACAX (32 years). JCLCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JCLCX (16.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCLCX: PACAX (0) vs JCLCX (1000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.46 vs. JCLCX (6.00). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.78 vs. JCLCX (5.55).
| JCLCX | PACAX | JCLCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.00 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.00 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.422 | 7.904 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 576M | 276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 3.40 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.00 | 6.46 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.46 | 21.02 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.55 | 10.78 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.44 | 28.28 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement