Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JCVCX vs RMEBX
JCVCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts JCVCX vs RMEBX
JHancock Classic Value C
Price$23.82
Change+$0.50 (+2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets584.92M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.39
Change+$0.59 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.67B
JCVCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JCVCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JCVCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. JCVCX (585M). JCVCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: JCVCX (1.90) vs RMEBX (1.11). JCVCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: JCVCX (23 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). JCVCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. JCVCX (29.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCVCX: RMEBX (250) vs JCVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.40 vs. JCVCX (-28.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.93 vs. JCVCX (-2.90).
| JCVCX | RMEBX | JCVCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.07 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.370 | 10.593 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 585M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.11 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.98 | 10.40 | -279% |
| Returns for 3 years | -37.82 | 22.90 | -165% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.90 | 53.93 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.34 | 77.74 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement