Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JCVCX vs RMFCX
JCVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts JCVCX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value C
Price$23.37
Change+$0.28 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets595.6M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
JCVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JCVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JCVCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. JCVCX (596M). JCVCX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: JCVCX (1.91) vs RMFCX (1.31). JCVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: JCVCX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). JCVCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. JCVCX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCVCX: RMFCX (250) vs JCVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. JCVCX (-30.51). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. JCVCX (-8.77).
| JCVCX | RMFCX | JCVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.91 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.91 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.361 | 5.919 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 596M | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.31 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | -30.51 | 9.01 | -338% |
| Returns for 3 years | -40.43 | 17.82 | -227% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.77 | 51.66 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.41 | 70.47 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement