Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JCVCX vs RMFCX
JCVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts JCVCX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value C
Price$23.81
Change+$0.29 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets601.13M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.27
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
JCVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JCVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JCVCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. JCVCX (601M). JCVCX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: JCVCX (1.91) vs RMFCX (1.31). JCVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: JCVCX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). JCVCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. JCVCX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCVCX: RMFCX (250) vs JCVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. JCVCX (-28.37). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.87 vs. JCVCX (9.50).
| JCVCX | RMFCX | JCVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.91 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.91 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.248 | 7.403 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 601M | 106B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.31 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.37 | 9.64 | -294% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.70 | 26.42 | -124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.50 | 63.87 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.67 | 76.11 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement