JDCMF
Price
$16.88
Change
+$0.38 (+2.30%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
48.21B
VIPS
Price
$15.98
Change
-$0.15 (-0.93%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.23B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

JDCMF vs VIPS

Header iconJDCMF vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts JDCMF vs VIPSBanner chart's image
JD.com
Price$16.88
Change+$0.38 (+2.30%)
Volume$773
Capitalization48.21B
Vipshop Holdings
Price$15.98
Change-$0.15 (-0.93%)
Volume$1.18M
Capitalization8.23B
JDCMF vs VIPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JDCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JDCMF vs. VIPS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JDCMF is a StrongBuy and VIPS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (JDCMF: $16.88 vs. VIPS: $15.98)
Brand notoriety: JDCMF: Not notable vs. VIPS: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JDCMF: 5% vs. VIPS: 40%
Market capitalization -- JDCMF: $48.21B vs. VIPS: $8.23B
JDCMF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $48.21B. VIPS’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $8.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.46T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $48.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JDCMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVIPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JDCMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VIPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VIPS is a better buy in the long-term than JDCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JDCMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIPS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JDCMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VIPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VIPS is a better buy in the short-term than JDCMF.

Price Growth

JDCMF (@Internet Retail) experienced а +4.91% price change this week, while VIPS (@Internet Retail) price change was +1.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +88.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +106.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

JDCMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

VIPS is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+2.37% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JDCMF($48.2B) has a higher market cap than VIPS($8.23B). VIPS (8.23) and JDCMF (8.19) have similar P/E ratio . VIPS YTD gains are higher at: 23.132 vs. JDCMF (-0.910). JDCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 58.7B vs. VIPS (9.53B). JDCMF has more cash in the bank: 194B vs. VIPS (28.6B). VIPS has less debt than JDCMF: VIPS (5.09B) vs JDCMF (87.4B). JDCMF has higher revenues than VIPS: JDCMF (1.2T) vs VIPS (107B).
JDCMFVIPSJDCMF / VIPS
Capitalization48.2B8.23B586%
EBITDA58.7B9.53B616%
Gain YTD-0.91023.132-4%
P/E Ratio8.198.23100%
Revenue1.2T107B1,121%
Total Cash194B28.6B678%
Total Debt87.4B5.09B1,718%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
23
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JDCMFVIPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JDCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFNCX89.920.27
+0.30%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529C
FDFAX87.82N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Port
BQLCX23.11N/A
N/A
Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Instl
GQERX21.56N/A
N/A
GQG Partners US Select Quality Eq R6
MLOAX8.91N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy A

JDCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JDCMF has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JDCMF jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JDCMF
1D Price
Change %
JDCMF100%
N/A
JD - JDCMF
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
BABA - JDCMF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
MPNGY - JDCMF
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
BABAF - JDCMF
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
VIPS - JDCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
More

VIPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIPS
1D Price
Change %
VIPS100%
-0.93%
JD - VIPS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
BABA - VIPS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
PDD - VIPS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
MPNGY - VIPS
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
RERE - VIPS
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
More