JDCMF
Price
$16.06
Change
+$0.31 (+1.97%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
46.3B
VIPS
Price
$14.99
Change
-$0.08 (-0.53%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.72B
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

JDCMF vs VIPS

Header iconJDCMF vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts JDCMF vs VIPSBanner chart's image
JD.com
Price$16.06
Change+$0.31 (+1.97%)
Volume$91.39K
Capitalization46.3B
Vipshop Holdings
Price$14.99
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
Volume$991.95K
Capitalization7.72B
JDCMF vs VIPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JDCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JDCMF vs. VIPS commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JDCMF is a Hold and VIPS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (JDCMF: $16.06 vs. VIPS: $14.99)
Brand notoriety: JDCMF: Not notable vs. VIPS: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JDCMF: 11% vs. VIPS: 29%
Market capitalization -- JDCMF: $46.3B vs. VIPS: $7.72B
JDCMF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $46.3B. VIPS’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $7.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $45.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JDCMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVIPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JDCMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VIPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VIPS is a better buy in the long-term than JDCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JDCMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIPS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JDCMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • VIPS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VIPS is a better buy in the short-term than JDCMF.

Price Growth

JDCMF (@Internet Retail) experienced а +1.97% price change this week, while VIPS (@Internet Retail) price change was +1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

JDCMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

VIPS is expected to report earnings on Aug 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+2.54% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JDCMF($46.3B) has a higher market cap than VIPS($7.72B). JDCMF (7.80) and VIPS (7.77) have similar P/E ratio . VIPS YTD gains are higher at: 15.504 vs. JDCMF (-5.696). JDCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 58.7B vs. VIPS (9.53B). JDCMF has more cash in the bank: 194B vs. VIPS (28.6B). VIPS has less debt than JDCMF: VIPS (5.09B) vs JDCMF (87.4B). JDCMF has higher revenues than VIPS: JDCMF (1.2T) vs VIPS (107B).
JDCMFVIPSJDCMF / VIPS
Capitalization46.3B7.72B600%
EBITDA58.7B9.53B616%
Gain YTD-5.69615.504-37%
P/E Ratio7.807.77100%
Revenue1.2T107B1,121%
Total Cash194B28.6B678%
Total Debt87.4B5.09B1,718%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JDCMFVIPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JDCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVFYX77.370.67
+0.87%
Davis Financial Y
IFAFX26.790.09
+0.34%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer F1
CMTFX100.07N/A
N/A
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
CNWIX21.42N/A
N/A
Calamos Evolving World Growth I
WAYEX17.64N/A
N/A
Waycross Managed Risk Equity Fund

JDCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JDCMF has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JDCMF jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JDCMF
1D Price
Change %
JDCMF100%
N/A
JD - JDCMF
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
BABA - JDCMF
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
MPNGY - JDCMF
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
BABAF - JDCMF
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
VIPS - JDCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
More

VIPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIPS
1D Price
Change %
VIPS100%
-0.53%
BABA - VIPS
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
JD - VIPS
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
PDD - VIPS
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
RERE - VIPS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
MPNGY - VIPS
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
More