Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JDVCX vs RLBFX
JDVCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts JDVCX vs RLBFX
JPMorgan Diversified C
Price$16.46
Change-$0.08 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets415.59M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.78
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
JDVCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JDVCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JDVCX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. JDVCX (416M). JDVCX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: JDVCX (2.13) vs RLBFX (1.97). JDVCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: JDVCX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). JDVCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). JDVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JDVCX: RLBFX (250) vs JDVCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. JDVCX (6.85). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.76 vs. JDVCX (-1.19).
| JDVCX | RLBFX | JDVCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.29 | 503% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.29 | 600% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.737 | 14.008 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 416M | 264B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.97 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 9.13 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.70 | 41.78 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.19 | 39.76 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.55 | 73.89 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement