Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JEMQX vs RNWBX
JEMQX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts JEMQX vs RNWBX
JHancock Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$10.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.94
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
JEMQX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JEMQX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JEMQX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. JEMQX (1.29B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than JEMQX: RNWBX (0.13) vs JEMQX (0.12). JEMQX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: JEMQX (10 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than JEMQX (1.47). JEMQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than JEMQX: RNWBX (250) vs JEMQX (1000). JEMQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.41 vs. RNWBX (6.57). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.37 vs. JEMQX (-8.04).
| JEMQX | RNWBX | JEMQX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.67 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.025 | 11.407 | 53% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 67.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.13 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.41 | 6.57 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.26 | 21.12 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.04 | 25.37 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement