Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JEMQX vs RNWHX
JEMQX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts JEMQX vs RNWHX
JHancock Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$11.23
Change+$0.12 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.37
Change+$1.08 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.06B
JEMQX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JEMQX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JEMQX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. JEMQX (1.3B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than JEMQX: RNWHX (0.93) vs JEMQX (0.11). JEMQX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: JEMQX (10 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). JEMQX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). JEMQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JEMQX: RNWHX (250) vs JEMQX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. JEMQX (12.59). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 28.83 vs. JEMQX (-14.63).
| JEMQX | RNWHX | JEMQX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.72 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.72 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.442 | 24.138 | 72% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 74.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.93 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.59 | 15.11 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.07 | 61.54 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.63 | 28.83 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement