JFBHF
Price
$297.32
Change
+$30.84 (+11.57%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.61B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
MTCPY
Price
$10.00
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
21.55B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JFBHF vs MTCPY

Header iconJFBHF vs MTCPY Comparison
Open Charts JFBHF vs MTCPYBanner chart's image
Jungfraubahn Holding Ag
Price$297.32
Change+$30.84 (+11.57%)
Volume$1
Capitalization1.61B
MTR
Price$10.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$321
Capitalization21.55B
JFBHF vs MTCPY Comparison Chart in %
JFBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTCPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JFBHF vs. MTCPY commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFBHF is a Hold and MTCPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (JFBHF: $297.32 vs. MTCPY: $10.00)
Brand notoriety: JFBHF and MTCPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JFBHF: 5% vs. MTCPY: 43%
Market capitalization -- JFBHF: $1.61B vs. MTCPY: $21.55B
JFBHF [@Railroads] is valued at $1.61B. MTCPY’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $21.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $134.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $16.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JFBHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTCPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JFBHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTCPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JFBHF is a better buy in the long-term than MTCPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JFBHF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTCPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JFBHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MTCPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JFBHF is a better buy in the short-term than MTCPY.

Price Growth

JFBHF (@Railroads) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MTCPY (@Railroads) price change was -2.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (+0.36% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTCPY($21.6B) has a higher market cap than JFBHF($1.61B). JFBHF has higher P/E ratio than MTCPY: JFBHF (17.15) vs MTCPY (9.22). JFBHF YTD gains are higher at: 63.076 vs. MTCPY (3.607). MTCPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.4B vs. JFBHF (139M). MTCPY has higher revenues than JFBHF: MTCPY (58.1B) vs JFBHF (269M).
JFBHFMTCPYJFBHF / MTCPY
Capitalization1.61B21.6B7%
EBITDA139M24.4B1%
Gain YTD63.0763.6071,749%
P/E Ratio17.159.22186%
Revenue269M58.1B0%
Total Cash37.8MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JFBHF vs MTCPY: Fundamental Ratings
JFBHF
MTCPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4592
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1694
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5038

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTCPY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JFBHF (70). This means that MTCPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than JFBHF’s over the last 12 months.

JFBHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTCPY (100). This means that JFBHF’s stock grew significantly faster than MTCPY’s over the last 12 months.

JFBHF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MTCPY (100). This means that JFBHF’s stock grew similarly to MTCPY’s over the last 12 months.

JFBHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MTCPY (59). This means that JFBHF’s stock grew similarly to MTCPY’s over the last 12 months.

JFBHF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTCPY (94). This means that JFBHF’s stock grew significantly faster than MTCPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JFBHFMTCPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JFBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTCPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRKQX7.710.08
+1.04%
PGIM Real Estate Income R6
NLCAX55.40N/A
N/A
Voya Large-Cap Growth A
TQCYX19.96N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dividend Equity Y
MVGKX18.54N/A
N/A
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity R2
JMGQX55.05N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R4

JFBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JFBHF and FGROF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JFBHF and FGROF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFBHF
1D Price
Change %
JFBHF100%
N/A
FGROF - JFBHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJPRY - JFBHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
GRPOF - JFBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRJF - JFBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTCPY - JFBHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTCPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTCPY and FGROY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTCPY and FGROY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTCPY
1D Price
Change %
MTCPY100%
N/A
FGROY - MTCPY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJPRY - MTCPY
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
MTRJF - MTCPY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFBHF - MTCPY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNGYF - MTCPY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More