Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFFCX vs RBMTX
JFFCX vs RBMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFFCX vs. RBMTX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFFCX is a Hold and RBMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBMTX has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. JFFCX (1.99B). JFFCX pays higher dividends than RBMTX: JFFCX (1.21) vs RBMTX (0.21). JFFCX was incepted earlier than RBMTX: JFFCX (13 years) vs RBMTX (15 years). JFFCX (1.49) and RBMTX (1.48) have similar cost to investors . JFFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RBMTX (5.00). RBMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFFCX: RBMTX (250) vs JFFCX (500). RBMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.70 vs. JFFCX (9.92). RBMTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.75 vs. JFFCX (36.33).
| JFFCX | RBMTX | JFFCX / RBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.48 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.48 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.030 | 10.589 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 27.3B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.21 | 587% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.92 | 10.70 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.33 | 41.39 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.33 | 40.75 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.63 | 75.74 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement