Ad is loading...
JFFCX vs RBMTX
JFFCX vs RBMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFFCX vs. RBMTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFFCX is a Hold and RBMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBMTX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. JFFCX (1.81B). JFFCX pays higher dividends than RBMTX: JFFCX (1.32) vs RBMTX (0.23). JFFCX was incepted earlier than RBMTX: JFFCX (13 years) vs RBMTX (15 years). JFFCX (1.49) and RBMTX (1.48) have similar cost to investors . JFFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RBMTX (5.00). RBMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFFCX: RBMTX (250) vs JFFCX (500). JFFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. RBMTX (4.89). RBMTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.30 vs. JFFCX (36.93).
| JFFCX | RBMTX | JFFCX / RBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.48 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.48 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.937 | -1.422 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 24.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.23 | 572% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 4.89 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.93 | 16.13 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.93 | 39.30 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.44 | 56.36 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...