Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFFCX vs RBMTX
JFFCX vs RBMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFFCX vs. RBMTX commentary
Jun 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFFCX is a Hold and RBMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBMTX has more cash in the bank: 26.2B vs. JFFCX (1.93B). JFFCX pays higher dividends than RBMTX: JFFCX (1.26) vs RBMTX (0.22). JFFCX was incepted earlier than RBMTX: JFFCX (13 years) vs RBMTX (15 years). JFFCX (1.49) and RBMTX (1.48) have similar cost to investors . JFFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RBMTX (5.00). RBMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFFCX: RBMTX (250) vs JFFCX (500). JFFCX (8.11) and RBMTX (7.87) have marching annual gain over last year. RBMTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.05 vs. JFFCX (34.88).
| JFFCX | RBMTX | JFFCX / RBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.48 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.48 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.871 | 5.927 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 26.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.22 | 582% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 7.87 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.28 | 35.63 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.88 | 39.05 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.23 | 66.36 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers