JFHHF
Price
$1.46
Change
+$0.21 (+16.80%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
800.65M
JTCPF
Price
$11.52
Change
-$0.03 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

JFHHF vs JTCPF

Header iconJFHHF vs JTCPF Comparison
Open Charts JFHHF vs JTCPFBanner chart's image
Jupiter Fund Management
Price$1.46
Change+$0.21 (+16.80%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization800.65M
JTC
Price$11.52
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
Volume$575
Capitalization1.48B
JFHHF vs JTCPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JFHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JTCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JFHHF vs. JTCPF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFHHF is a Buy and JTCPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (JFHHF: $1.46 vs. JTCPF: $11.52)
Brand notoriety: JFHHF and JTCPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JFHHF: 199% vs. JTCPF: 23%
Market capitalization -- JFHHF: $800.65M vs. JTCPF: $1.48B
JFHHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $800.65M. JTCPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JFHHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJTCPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JFHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JTCPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JFHHF is a better buy in the long-term than JTCPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JFHHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JTCPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JFHHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • JTCPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JFHHF is a better buy in the short-term than JTCPF.

Price Growth

JFHHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +16.64% price change this week, while JTCPF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.03% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JTCPF($1.48B) has a higher market cap than JFHHF($801M). JTCPF has higher P/E ratio than JFHHF: JTCPF (32.05) vs JFHHF (8.98). JFHHF YTD gains are higher at: 40.462 vs. JTCPF (-11.379). JFHHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 107M vs. JTCPF (38M). JFHHF has more cash in the bank: 448M vs. JTCPF (60.9M). JFHHF has less debt than JTCPF: JFHHF (49.6M) vs JTCPF (197M). JFHHF has higher revenues than JTCPF: JFHHF (417M) vs JTCPF (174M).
JFHHFJTCPFJFHHF / JTCPF
Capitalization801M1.48B54%
EBITDA107M38M282%
Gain YTD40.462-11.379-356%
P/E Ratio8.9832.0528%
Revenue417M174M240%
Total Cash448M60.9M736%
Total Debt49.6M197M25%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JFHHFJTCPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JFHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JTCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPMIX19.92N/A
N/A
Voya Index Plus MidCap Port I
MMVYX9.32N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Company Val Svc
LLGLX14.41N/A
N/A
Longleaf Partners Global
VKSCX19.05N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Core C
BTMKX18.36N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx K

JFHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JFHHF has been loosely correlated with HFAHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JFHHF jumps, then HFAHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFHHF
1D Price
Change %
JFHHF100%
N/A
HFAHF - JFHHF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TURN - JFHHF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
JTCPF - JFHHF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
AMTD - JFHHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
PNXPF - JFHHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JTCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JTCPF and JFHHF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JTCPF and JFHHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JTCPF
1D Price
Change %
JTCPF100%
-0.26%
JFHHF - JTCPF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VINP - JTCPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.15%
ELRNF - JTCPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EATBF - JTCPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+20.00%
OFSTF - JTCPF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
More