JFHHF
Price
$1.46
Change
+$0.21 (+16.80%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
800.65M
PNXPF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JFHHF vs PNXPF

Header iconJFHHF vs PNXPF Comparison
Open Charts JFHHF vs PNXPFBanner chart's image
Jupiter Fund Management
Price$1.46
Change+$0.21 (+16.80%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization800.65M
Planet Ventures
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization4.17M
JFHHF vs PNXPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JFHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JFHHF vs. PNXPF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFHHF is a Hold and PNXPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (JFHHF: $1.46 vs. PNXPF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: JFHHF and PNXPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JFHHF: 198% vs. PNXPF: 179%
Market capitalization -- JFHHF: $800.65M vs. PNXPF: $4.17M
JFHHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $800.65M. PNXPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JFHHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePNXPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JFHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PNXPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both JFHHF and PNXPF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JFHHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNXPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JFHHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PNXPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both JFHHF and PNXPF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

JFHHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PNXPF (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFHHF($801M) has a higher market cap than PNXPF($4.17M). PNXPF YTD gains are higher at: 119.417 vs. JFHHF (40.462). JFHHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 107M vs. PNXPF (-1.94M). JFHHF has more cash in the bank: 448M vs. PNXPF (5.13M). PNXPF has less debt than JFHHF: PNXPF (327K) vs JFHHF (49.6M). JFHHF has higher revenues than PNXPF: JFHHF (417M) vs PNXPF (-1.84M).
JFHHFPNXPFJFHHF / PNXPF
Capitalization801M4.17M19,195%
EBITDA107M-1.94M-5,526%
Gain YTD40.462119.41734%
P/E Ratio8.98N/A-
Revenue417M-1.84M-22,638%
Total Cash448M5.13M8,741%
Total Debt49.6M327K15,168%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PNXPF: Fundamental Ratings
PNXPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JFHHFPNXPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JFHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENGN3.800.06
+1.60%
enGene Holdings
ITGR121.00-0.19
-0.16%
Integer Holdings Corp
ABEV2.47-0.02
-0.80%
Ambev SA
RCUS8.47-0.12
-1.40%
Arcus Biosciences
PSHG1.68-0.04
-2.33%
Performance Shipping

JFHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JFHHF has been loosely correlated with HFAHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JFHHF jumps, then HFAHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFHHF
1D Price
Change %
JFHHF100%
N/A
HFAHF - JFHHF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TURN - JFHHF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
JTCPF - JFHHF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMTD - JFHHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.94%
PNXPF - JFHHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PNXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNXPF and HFAHF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNXPF and HFAHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNXPF
1D Price
Change %
PNXPF100%
N/A
HFAHF - PNXPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFHHF - PNXPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGHCF - PNXPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+35.42%
PIAC - PNXPF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - PNXPF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
More