JFHHF
Price
$1.73
Change
-$0.07 (-3.89%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
812.69M
WNMLA
Price
$3.85
Change
-$0.15 (-3.75%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.46M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JFHHF vs WNMLA

Header iconJFHHF vs WNMLA Comparison
Open Charts JFHHF vs WNMLABanner chart's image
Jupiter Fund Management
Price$1.73
Change-$0.07 (-3.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization812.69M
Winmill & Co
Price$3.85
Change-$0.15 (-3.75%)
Volume$5.52K
Capitalization5.46M
JFHHF vs WNMLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JFHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNMLA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JFHHF vs. WNMLA commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFHHF is a Hold and WNMLA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (JFHHF: $1.73 vs. WNMLA: $3.85)
Brand notoriety: JFHHF and WNMLA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JFHHF: 3% vs. WNMLA: 232%
Market capitalization -- JFHHF: $812.69M vs. WNMLA: $5.46M
JFHHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $812.69M. WNMLA’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JFHHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWNMLA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JFHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WNMLA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JFHHF is a better buy in the long-term than WNMLA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JFHHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WNMLA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JFHHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WNMLA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both JFHHF and WNMLA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

JFHHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WNMLA (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFHHF($813M) has a higher market cap than WNMLA($5.46M). JFHHF YTD gains are higher at: 66.667 vs. WNMLA (-9.412).
JFHHFWNMLAJFHHF / WNMLA
Capitalization813M5.46M14,885%
EBITDA89.1MN/A-
Gain YTD66.667-9.412-708%
P/E Ratio11.92N/A-
Revenue381MN/A-
Total Cash413MN/A-
Total Debt0N/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WNMLA: Fundamental Ratings
WNMLA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JFHHFWNMLA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JFHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNMLA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHFS4.500.68
+17.80%
SHF Holdings Inc
AVTX11.601.44
+14.17%
Avalo Therapeutics
AVNT37.720.42
+1.13%
Avient Corp
PHG27.930.20
+0.72%
Koninklijke Philips NV
KE29.900.14
+0.47%
Kimball Electronics

JFHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JFHHF has been loosely correlated with HFAHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JFHHF jumps, then HFAHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFHHF
1D Price
Change %
JFHHF100%
N/A
HFAHF - JFHHF
41%
Loosely correlated
+24.31%
TURN - JFHHF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
JTCPF - JFHHF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMTD - JFHHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
PNXPF - JFHHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More

WNMLA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WNMLA and DHIL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WNMLA and DHIL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WNMLA
1D Price
Change %
WNMLA100%
N/A
DHIL - WNMLA
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
HALFF - WNMLA
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
JFHHF - WNMLA
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCMG - WNMLA
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
STEP - WNMLA
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
More