Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFLJX vs NADCX
JFLJX vs NADCX Comparison
Open Charts JFLJX vs NADCX
JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth R6
Price$13.41
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.26B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Cnsrv A
Price$10.22
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets220.4M
JFLJX vs NADCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFLJX vs. NADCX commentary
Nov 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFLJX is a Hold and NADCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFLJX has more cash in the bank: 4.26B vs. NADCX (220M). JFLJX pays higher dividends than NADCX: JFLJX (3.65) vs NADCX (3.04). JFLJX was incepted earlier than NADCX: JFLJX (8 years) vs NADCX (26 years). NADCX (0.83) is less costly to investors than JFLJX (0.44). NADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.30 vs. JFLJX (11.00). NADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFLJX: NADCX (2000) vs JFLJX (15000000). JFLJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. NADCX (1.84). JFLJX return over 5 years is better than : 14.56 vs. NADCX (12.54).
| JFLJX | NADCX | JFLJX / NADCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.83 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.83 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.700 | 10.434 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000000 | 2000 | 750,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.26B | 220M | 1,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.65 | 3.04 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.30 | 1.84 | 397% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.17 | 18.10 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.56 | 12.54 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers