Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFLJX vs NADCX
JFLJX vs NADCX Comparison
Open Charts JFLJX vs NADCX
JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth R6
Price$13.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.11B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Cnsrv A
Price$10.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.67M
JFLJX vs NADCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFLJX vs. NADCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFLJX is a Hold and NADCX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFLJX has more cash in the bank: 4.11B vs. NADCX (219M). JFLJX pays higher dividends than NADCX: JFLJX (3.71) vs NADCX (3.07). JFLJX was incepted earlier than NADCX: JFLJX (8 years) vs NADCX (25 years). NADCX (0.83) is less costly to investors than JFLJX (0.44). NADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.30 vs. JFLJX (8.00). NADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFLJX: NADCX (2000) vs JFLJX (15000000). JFLJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.21 vs. NADCX (1.06). JFLJX return over 5 years is better than : 16.26 vs. NADCX (13.86).
| JFLJX | NADCX | JFLJX / NADCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.83 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.83 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.123 | 7.241 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000000 | 2000 | 750,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.11B | 219M | 1,878% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.71 | 3.07 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.21 | 1.06 | 588% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.93 | 16.56 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.26 | 13.86 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers