Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFNCX vs SHSAX
JFNCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFNCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFNCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. JFNCX (4.4B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than JFNCX: SHSAX (0.22) vs JFNCX (0.00). JFNCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: JFNCX (16 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). JFNCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). JFNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNCX: SHSAX (1000) vs JFNCX (2500). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.37 vs. JFNCX (-19.05). JFNCX return over 5 years is better than : -6.78 vs. SHSAX (-13.41).
| JFNCX | SHSAX | JFNCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.09 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.09 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.274 | -2.530 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.4B | 6.28B | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.05 | -17.37 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.12 | -2.80 | -111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.78 | -13.41 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.54 | 4.32 | -244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers