Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFNCX vs SHSAX
JFNCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFNCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFNCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.12B vs. JFNCX (4.49B). SHSAX pays higher dividends than JFNCX: SHSAX (0.23) vs JFNCX (0.00). JFNCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: JFNCX (16 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). JFNCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). SHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. JFNCX (35.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNCX: SHSAX (1000) vs JFNCX (2500). JFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.52 vs. SHSAX (-17.76). JFNCX return over 5 years is better than : -4.61 vs. SHSAX (-15.48).
| JFNCX | SHSAX | JFNCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.09 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.09 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.893 | -4.757 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.49B | 6.12B | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.52 | -17.76 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.84 | -2.37 | -289% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.61 | -15.48 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.26 | 9.07 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement