It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JGHG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKNAMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
JGHG (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KNAMF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.12%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +5.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.19%.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Electronics/Appliances (+5.84% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
JGHG | KNAMF | JGHG / KNAMF | |
Capitalization | 55.2M | 19.6B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | 135B | - |
Gain YTD | 0.000 | 123.248 | - |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 36.65 | - |
Revenue | N/A | 429B | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 280B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 59.9B | - |
JGHG | KNAMF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JGHG's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KNAMF (83). This means that JGHG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KNAMF’s over the last 12 months.
KNAMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JGHG (100). This means that KNAMF’s stock grew significantly faster than JGHG’s over the last 12 months.
KNAMF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JGHG (100). This means that KNAMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JGHG’s over the last 12 months.
KNAMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JGHG (71). This means that KNAMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JGHG’s over the last 12 months.
KNAMF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JGHG (100). This means that KNAMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JGHG’s over the last 12 months.
KNAMF | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago19% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago18% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
CONL | 34.37 | 0.32 | +0.94% |
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | |||
XB | 39.81 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
BondBloxx B Rated USD Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF | |||
APRW | 34.12 | -0.06 | -0.16% |
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF | |||
DYNF | 58.84 | -0.13 | -0.22% |
iShares U.S. Equity Fac Rotation Act ETF | |||
PDCC | 16.82 | -0.23 | -1.35% |
Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc. |
A.I.dvisor tells us that JGHG and KNAMF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JGHG and KNAMF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JGHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
JGHG | 100% | N/A | ||
KNAMF - JGHG | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TMOAY - JGHG | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
VS - JGHG | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.92% | ||
JAMF - JGHG | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.25% | ||
KXSCF - JGHG | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KNAMF has been loosely correlated with NEXOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KNAMF jumps, then NEXOY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KNAMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KNAMF | 100% | N/A | ||
NEXOY - KNAMF | 42% Loosely correlated | -4.62% | ||
NEXOF - KNAMF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
BTRCF - KNAMF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
JGHG - KNAMF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DGNOF - KNAMF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |