Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHAC vs RECS
JHAC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts JHAC vs RECS
JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF
Price$15.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$38.81
Change-$0.12 (-0.31%)
Volume$419.89K
Net Assets3.42B
JHAC vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHAC vs. RECS commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHAC is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.42B vs. JHAC (4.44M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than JHAC: RECS (12.103) vs JHAC (2.015). JHAC was incepted earlier than RECS: JHAC (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than JHAC (0.72). RECS has a higher turnover JHAC (34.00) vs JHAC (34.00).
| JHAC | RECS | JHAC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.015 | 12.103 | 17% |
| Net Assets | 4.44M | 3.42B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.15 | 480% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 49.00 | 69% |
| Yield | 0.66 | 0.64 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| JHAC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
JHAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHAC has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JHAC jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JHAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JHAC | 100% | N/A | ||
| GS - JHAC | 68% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| PH - JHAC | 67% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| MS - JHAC | 66% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| KKR - JHAC | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| RRX - JHAC | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||