Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBCX vs RGACX
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts JHBCX vs RGACX
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$71.11
Change-$0.35 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.09B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.45
Change-$0.56 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBCX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. JHBCX (6.09B). RGACX pays higher dividends than JHBCX: RGACX (0.07) vs JHBCX (0.00). JHBCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: JHBCX (20 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than JHBCX (0.77). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: JHBCX (0) vs RGACX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.71 vs. RGACX (14.51). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.62 vs. JHBCX (28.43).
| JHBCX | RGACX | JHBCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.94 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.417 | 18.697 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.09B | 343B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.71 | 14.51 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.89 | 72.98 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.43 | 40.62 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.07 | 99.82 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement