Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBCX vs RGACX
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts JHBCX vs RGACX
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$69.90
Change+$0.69 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.12
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBCX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBCX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. JHBCX (5.82B). RGACX pays higher dividends than JHBCX: RGACX (0.07) vs JHBCX (0.00). JHBCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: JHBCX (20 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than JHBCX (0.75). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: JHBCX (0) vs RGACX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. RGACX (6.37). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.00 vs. JHBCX (22.87).
| JHBCX | RGACX | JHBCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.720 | 15.460 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.82B | 327B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.24 | 6.37 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.36 | 61.11 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.87 | 32.00 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.72 | 85.80 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement