Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBCX vs RGEBX
JHBCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts JHBCX vs RGEBX
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$71.11
Change-$0.35 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.09B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.70
Change-$0.55 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
JHBCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBCX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. JHBCX (6.09B). JHBCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . JHBCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: JHBCX (20 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than JHBCX (0.77). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: JHBCX (0) vs RGEBX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.71 vs. RGEBX (14.27). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.33 vs. JHBCX (28.43).
| JHBCX | RGEBX | JHBCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.09 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.417 | 18.561 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.09B | 343B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.71 | 14.27 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.89 | 72.01 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.43 | 39.33 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.07 | 95.24 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement