Ad is loading...
JHBIX vs PDBZX
JHBIX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts JHBIX vs PDBZX
JHancock Bond I
Price$13.36
Change+$0.07 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.97B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.89
Change+$0.06 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.53B
JHBIX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBIX vs. PDBZX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBIX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.5B vs. JHBIX (26B). PDBZX (4.64) and JHBIX (4.43) have matching dividends . JHBIX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: JHBIX (24 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) and JHBIX (0.48) have similar cost to investors . JHBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHBIX: PDBZX (0) vs JHBIX (250000). PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. JHBIX (6.31). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.95 vs. JHBIX (-0.42).
| JHBIX | PDBZX | JHBIX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.49 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.50 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.966 | 1.225 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26B | 48.5B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.43 | 4.64 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.31 | 6.77 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.19 | 4.74 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.42 | 0.95 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.53 | 15.72 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...