Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBSX vs PDBAX
JHBSX vs PDBAX Comparison
Open Charts JHBSX vs PDBAX
JHancock Bond R6
Price$13.72
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.97B
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$12.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.93B
JHBSX vs PDBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBSX vs. PDBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBSX is a Hold and PDBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 51.9B vs. JHBSX (27B). JHBSX pays higher dividends than PDBAX: JHBSX (4.56) vs PDBAX (4.29). JHBSX was incepted earlier than PDBAX: JHBSX (14 years) vs PDBAX (31 years). PDBAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than JHBSX (0.36). PDBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. JHBSX (100.00). PDBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHBSX: PDBAX (1000) vs JHBSX (1000000). JHBSX (6.78) and PDBAX (6.56) have marching annual gain over last year. JHBSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.48 vs. PDBAX (-2.08).
| JHBSX | PDBAX | JHBSX / PDBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.76 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.77 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.895 | 6.759 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27B | 51.9B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.56 | 4.29 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 6.56 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.92 | 17.56 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.48 | -2.08 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.98 | 21.60 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers