Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBSX vs PDBAX
JHBSX vs PDBAX Comparison
Open Charts JHBSX vs PDBAX
JHancock Bond R6
Price$13.57
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.65B
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$12.06
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.99B
JHBSX vs PDBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBSX vs. PDBAX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBSX is a Hold and PDBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 50B vs. JHBSX (26.6B). JHBSX pays higher dividends than PDBAX: JHBSX (4.60) vs PDBAX (4.37). JHBSX was incepted earlier than PDBAX: JHBSX (14 years) vs PDBAX (31 years). PDBAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than JHBSX (0.37). JHBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBAX (113.00). PDBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHBSX: PDBAX (1000) vs JHBSX (1000000). JHBSX (3.56) and PDBAX (3.54) have marching annual gain over last year. JHBSX return over 5 years is better than : -1.11 vs. PDBAX (-2.61).
| JHBSX | PDBAX | JHBSX / PDBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.76 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.77 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.618 | 4.492 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.6B | 50B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.60 | 4.37 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.56 | 3.54 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.74 | 8.48 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.11 | -2.61 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.90 | 18.24 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers