Ad is loading...
JHBSX vs PDBAX
JHBSX vs PDBAX Comparison
Open Charts JHBSX vs PDBAX
JHancock Bond R6
Price$13.49
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.3B
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$12.03
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.05B
JHBSX vs PDBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBSX vs. PDBAX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBSX is a Hold and PDBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 49B vs. JHBSX (26.3B). JHBSX (4.53) and PDBAX (4.38) have matching dividends . JHBSX was incepted earlier than PDBAX: JHBSX (14 years) vs PDBAX (30 years). PDBAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than JHBSX (0.37). JHBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBAX (113.00). PDBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHBSX: PDBAX (1000) vs JHBSX (1000000). PDBAX (7.78) and JHBSX (7.71) have marching annual gain over last year. JHBSX return over 5 years is better than : 1.22 vs. PDBAX (0.69).
| JHBSX | PDBAX | JHBSX / PDBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.76 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.77 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.359 | 2.607 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.3B | 49B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.53 | 4.38 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.71 | 7.78 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.46 | 5.92 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.22 | 0.69 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.17 | 15.18 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers