Ad is loading...
JHBSX vs PDBZX
JHBSX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts JHBSX vs PDBZX
JHancock Bond R6
Price$13.39
Change-$0.06 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.27B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.89
Change-$0.06 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.97B
JHBSX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBSX vs. PDBZX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBSX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 49B vs. JHBSX (26.3B). PDBZX (4.65) and JHBSX (4.57) have matching dividends . JHBSX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: JHBSX (14 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than JHBSX (0.37). JHBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHBSX: PDBZX (0) vs JHBSX (1000000). PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. JHBSX (6.90). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : 2.02 vs. JHBSX (1.23).
| JHBSX | PDBZX | JHBSX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.49 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.50 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.366 | 2.647 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.3B | 49B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.57 | 4.65 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | 7.38 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.92 | 7.20 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.23 | 2.02 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.41 | 18.66 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...