Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBSX vs PDBZX
JHBSX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts JHBSX vs PDBZX
JHancock Bond R6
Price$13.54
Change+$0.06 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.34B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.99
Change+$0.06 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.26B
JHBSX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBSX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBSX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 49.3B vs. JHBSX (26.3B). PDBZX (4.60) and JHBSX (4.56) have matching dividends . JHBSX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: JHBSX (14 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than JHBSX (0.37). JHBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHBSX: PDBZX (0) vs JHBSX (1000000). PDBZX (4.41) and JHBSX (4.30) have marching annual gain over last year. JHBSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.60 vs. PDBZX (-3.25).
| JHBSX | PDBZX | JHBSX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.49 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.50 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.377 | 3.294 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.3B | 49.3B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.56 | 4.60 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.30 | 4.41 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.22 | 7.49 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.60 | -3.25 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.85 | 19.63 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers