JHIUF
Price
$28.00
Change
+$4.00 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
17.58B
LKSGF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.07 (-87.50%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
66.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JHIUF vs LKSGF

Header iconJHIUF vs LKSGF Comparison
Open Charts JHIUF vs LKSGFBanner chart's image
James Hardie Industries
Price$28.00
Change+$4.00 (+16.67%)
Volume$1.13K
Capitalization17.58B
Luks Group Vietnam Holdings
Price$0.01
Change-$0.07 (-87.50%)
Volume$240
Capitalization66.39M
JHIUF vs LKSGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JHIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JHIUF vs. LKSGF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHIUF is a Hold and LKSGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (JHIUF: $28.00 vs. LKSGF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: JHIUF and LKSGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JHIUF: 2% vs. LKSGF: 10%
Market capitalization -- JHIUF: $17.58B vs. LKSGF: $66.39M
JHIUF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $17.58B. LKSGF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $66.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JHIUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLKSGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JHIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LKSGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JHIUF is a better buy in the long-term than LKSGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JHIUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKSGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JHIUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LKSGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JHIUF is a better buy in the short-term than LKSGF.

Price Growth

JHIUF (@Construction Materials) experienced а +16.67% price change this week, while LKSGF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHIUF($17.6B) has a higher market cap than LKSGF($66.4M). JHIUF has higher P/E ratio than LKSGF: JHIUF (27.66) vs LKSGF (10.45). JHIUF YTD gains are higher at: -0.143 vs. LKSGF (-88.235). JHIUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. LKSGF (97.5M). LKSGF (456M) and JHIUF (434M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LKSGF has less debt than JHIUF: LKSGF (84.8M) vs JHIUF (1.22B). JHIUF has higher revenues than LKSGF: JHIUF (3.85B) vs LKSGF (502M).
JHIUFLKSGFJHIUF / LKSGF
Capitalization17.6B66.4M26,506%
EBITDA1.01B97.5M1,032%
Gain YTD-0.143-88.2350%
P/E Ratio27.6610.45265%
Revenue3.85B502M767%
Total Cash434M456M95%
Total Debt1.22B84.8M1,438%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JHIUF vs LKSGF: Fundamental Ratings
JHIUF
LKSGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52100
SMR RATING
1..100
4386
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4896
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKSGF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as JHIUF (14). This means that LKSGF’s stock grew similarly to JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKSGF (100). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKSGF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKSGF (86). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKSGF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKSGF (96). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKSGF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKSGF (100). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKSGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JHIUFLKSGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
16%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JHIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLLTL0.080.01
+15.61%
Piedmont Lithium Inc.
BKBLF0.05N/A
N/A
Magnetic North Acquisition Corp.
WYGPF8.70N/A
N/A
Worley Ltd.
PINXF0.70N/A
N/A
Peoples Insurance Company Group China
MRRDF0.59-0.01
-1.51%
Meridian Mining UK Societas

JHIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JHIUF and THYCF have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JHIUF and THYCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHIUF
1D Price
Change %
JHIUF100%
N/A
THYCF - JHIUF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCY - JHIUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCEM - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
IMYSF - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LKSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKSGF and SMID have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKSGF and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKSGF
1D Price
Change %
LKSGF100%
N/A
SMID - LKSGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
IBJHF - LKSGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSGTY - LKSGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMYSF - LKSGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JHIUF - LKSGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More