JHIUF
Price
$22.01
Change
+$4.13 (+23.10%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
17.58B
MCEM
Price
$241.00
Change
-$4.00 (-1.63%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
351.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JHIUF vs MCEM

Header iconJHIUF vs MCEM Comparison
Open Charts JHIUF vs MCEMBanner chart's image
James Hardie Industries
Price$22.01
Change+$4.13 (+23.10%)
Volume$500
Capitalization17.58B
Monarch Cement Co. (The)
Price$241.00
Change-$4.00 (-1.63%)
Volume$434
Capitalization351.9M
JHIUF vs MCEM Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JHIUF vs. MCEM commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHIUF is a Hold and MCEM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (JHIUF: $22.01 vs. MCEM: $241.00)
Brand notoriety: JHIUF and MCEM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JHIUF: 0% vs. MCEM: 22%
Market capitalization -- JHIUF: $17.58B vs. MCEM: $351.9M
JHIUF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $17.58B. MCEM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $351.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JHIUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCEM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JHIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCEM is a better buy in the long-term than JHIUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCEM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MCEM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

JHIUF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCEM (@Construction Materials) price change was -4.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCEM is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-2.71% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHIUF($17.6B) has a higher market cap than MCEM($352M). MCEM YTD gains are higher at: 12.111 vs. JHIUF (-21.505). JHIUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. MCEM (39M). MCEM has less debt than JHIUF: MCEM (2.83M) vs JHIUF (1.22B). JHIUF has higher revenues than MCEM: JHIUF (3.85B) vs MCEM (166M).
JHIUFMCEMJHIUF / MCEM
Capitalization17.6B352M5,000%
EBITDA1.01B39M2,579%
Gain YTD-21.50512.111-178%
P/E Ratio27.66N/A-
Revenue3.85B166M2,319%
Total Cash434MN/A-
Total Debt1.22B2.83M43,059%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JHIUF vs MCEM: Fundamental Ratings
JHIUF
MCEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5086
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
632
SMR RATING
1..100
4140
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6941
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a23

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JHIUF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as MCEM (15). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew similarly to MCEM’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JHIUF (63). This means that MCEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as JHIUF (41). This means that MCEM’s stock grew similarly to JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JHIUF (89). This means that MCEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as JHIUF (69). This means that MCEM’s stock grew similarly to JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGXX1.580.17
+12.06%
Digi Power X Inc
SNOW200.0520.93
+11.68%
Snowflake
BTBT2.500.08
+3.31%
Bit Digital
WT9.37-0.11
-1.16%
WisdomTree
FRSH14.42-0.21
-1.44%
Freshworks

JHIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JHIUF and THYCF have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JHIUF and THYCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHIUF
1D Price
Change %
JHIUF100%
N/A
THYCF - JHIUF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCY - JHIUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCEM - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
IMYSF - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCEM and PPCLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCEM and PPCLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCEM
1D Price
Change %
MCEM100%
-1.63%
PPCLY - MCEM
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCY - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JHIUF - MCEM
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSGTY - MCEM
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More