JHIUF
Price
$17.86
Change
-$1.29 (-6.74%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.87B
MCEM
Price
$232.65
Change
+$2.65 (+1.15%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
870.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JHIUF vs MCEM

Header iconJHIUF vs MCEM Comparison
Open Charts JHIUF vs MCEMBanner chart's image
James Hardie Industries
Price$17.86
Change-$1.29 (-6.74%)
Volume$248
Capitalization10.87B
Monarch Cement Co. (The)
Price$232.65
Change+$2.65 (+1.15%)
Volume$305
Capitalization870.5M
JHIUF vs MCEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JHIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JHIUF vs. MCEM commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHIUF is a Hold and MCEM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (JHIUF: $17.86 vs. MCEM: $232.65)
Brand notoriety: JHIUF and MCEM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JHIUF: 0% vs. MCEM: 38%
Market capitalization -- JHIUF: $10.87B vs. MCEM: $870.5M
JHIUF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $10.87B. MCEM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $870.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JHIUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCEM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JHIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCEM is a better buy in the long-term than JHIUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JHIUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCEM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JHIUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCEM is a better buy in the short-term than JHIUF.

Price Growth

JHIUF (@Construction Materials) experienced а -6.74% price change this week, while MCEM (@Construction Materials) price change was -0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.60% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHIUF($10.9B) has a higher market cap than MCEM($871M). JHIUF has higher P/E ratio than MCEM: JHIUF (23.19) vs MCEM (10.98). MCEM YTD gains are higher at: 8.597 vs. JHIUF (-36.305). JHIUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 843M vs. MCEM (114M). MCEM has less debt than JHIUF: MCEM (1.85M) vs JHIUF (2.61B). JHIUF has higher revenues than MCEM: JHIUF (3.79B) vs MCEM (271M).
JHIUFMCEMJHIUF / MCEM
Capitalization10.9B871M1,251%
EBITDA843M114M739%
Gain YTD-36.3058.597-422%
P/E Ratio23.1910.98211%
Revenue3.79B271M1,397%
Total Cash392MN/A-
Total Debt2.61B1.85M141,387%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JHIUF vs MCEM: Fundamental Ratings
JHIUF
MCEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1003
SMR RATING
1..100
5342
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9253
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7144
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5045

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JHIUF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as MCEM (15). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew similarly to MCEM’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JHIUF (100). This means that MCEM’s stock grew significantly faster than JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as JHIUF (53). This means that MCEM’s stock grew similarly to JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JHIUF (92). This means that MCEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

MCEM's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as JHIUF (71). This means that MCEM’s stock grew similarly to JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JHIUFMCEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JHIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMCAX19.850.22
+1.12%
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
PEIQX42.880.24
+0.56%
Principal Equity Income R5
NWZLX21.510.11
+0.51%
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
DGAGX41.230.16
+0.39%
BNY Mellon Appreciation Investor
EFCNX24.56N/A
N/A
Emerald Insights Investor

JHIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JHIUF and THYCF have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JHIUF and THYCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHIUF
1D Price
Change %
JHIUF100%
N/A
THYCF - JHIUF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCY - JHIUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCEM - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
IMYSF - JHIUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCEM and PPCLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCEM and PPCLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCEM
1D Price
Change %
MCEM100%
+1.15%
PPCLY - MCEM
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCY - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - MCEM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JHIUF - MCEM
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSGTY - MCEM
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More