Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHMU vs JMUB
JHMU vs JMUB Comparison
Open Charts JHMU vs JMUB
JHancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
Price$26.04
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Volume$8.73K
Net Assets30.54M
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
Price$50.36
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Volume$562.56K
Net Assets3.9B
JHMU vs JMUB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHMU vs. JMUB commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHMU is a Buy and JMUB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JMUB has more net assets: 3.9B vs. JHMU (30.5M). JHMU has a higher annual dividend yield than JMUB: JHMU (3.382) vs JMUB (3.096). JHMU was incepted earlier than JMUB: JHMU (2 years) vs JMUB (7 years). JMUB (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than JHMU (0.39). JHMU has a higher turnover JMUB (39.00) vs JMUB (39.00).
| JHMU | JMUB | JHMU / JMUB | |
| Gain YTD | 3.382 | 3.096 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 30.5M | 3.9B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.18 | 217% |
| Turnover | 83.00 | 39.00 | 213% |
| Yield | 5.16 | 3.46 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| JHMU | JMUB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 32% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 25% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 32% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 38% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 60% | 10 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 34% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
JHMU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JHMU and NEE have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JHMU and NEE's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JHMU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JHMU | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| NEE - JHMU | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
| AEE - JHMU | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| FE - JHMU | -0% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| AWK - JHMU | -1% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| UGI - JHMU | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
More | ||||
JMUB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JMUB and PLUS have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JMUB and PLUS's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JMUB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMUB | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| PLUS - JMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| RTX - JMUB | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.03% |