Ad is loading...
JHNBX vs PDBAX
JHNBX vs PDBAX Comparison
Open Charts JHNBX vs PDBAX
JHancock Bond A
Price$13.45
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.19B
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$12.01
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.88B
JHNBX vs PDBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHNBX vs. PDBAX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHNBX is a Hold and PDBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 48.9B vs. JHNBX (26.2B). PDBAX pays higher dividends than JHNBX: PDBAX (4.38) vs JHNBX (4.13). JHNBX was incepted earlier than PDBAX: JHNBX (52 years) vs PDBAX (30 years). JHNBX (0.78) and PDBAX (0.77) have similar cost to investors . JHNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBAX (113.00). JHNBX initial investment is less costly to investors than PDBAX (3%) vs PDBAX (3%). JHNBX (1000) and PDBAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.47 vs. JHNBX (7.03). PDBAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.36 vs. JHNBX (-1.09).
| JHNBX | PDBAX | JHNBX / PDBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.76 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.77 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.803 | 2.010 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 123% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.2B | 48.9B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.13 | 4.38 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.03 | 7.47 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.71 | 5.31 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.09 | 0.36 | -306% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.57 | 14.51 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...