Ad is loading...
JHNBX vs PDBZX
JHNBX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts JHNBX vs PDBZX
JHancock Bond A
Price$13.45
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.19B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.97
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.88B
JHNBX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHNBX vs. PDBZX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHNBX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.9B vs. JHNBX (26.2B). PDBZX pays higher dividends than JHNBX: PDBZX (4.64) vs JHNBX (4.13). JHNBX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: JHNBX (52 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). JHNBX (0.78) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). JHNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHNBX: PDBZX (0) vs JHNBX (1000). PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. JHNBX (7.03). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : 1.73 vs. JHNBX (-1.09).
| JHNBX | PDBZX | JHNBX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.49 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.50 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.803 | 2.081 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.2B | 48.9B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.13 | 4.64 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.03 | 7.77 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.71 | 6.11 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.09 | 1.73 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.57 | 17.60 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers