Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHNBX vs PDBZX
JHNBX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts JHNBX vs PDBZX
JHancock Bond A
Price$13.26
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.8B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.97B
JHNBX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHNBX vs. PDBZX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHNBX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48B vs. JHNBX (25.8B). PDBZX pays higher dividends than JHNBX: PDBZX (4.65) vs JHNBX (4.16). JHNBX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: JHNBX (52 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). JHNBX (0.78) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). JHNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHNBX: PDBZX (0) vs JHNBX (1000). PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.41 vs. JHNBX (3.70). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : -0.96 vs. JHNBX (-2.88).
| JHNBX | PDBZX | JHNBX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.49 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.50 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.706 | 0.843 | 84% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.8B | 48B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.16 | 4.65 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.70 | 4.41 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.82 | 6.23 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.88 | -0.96 | 301% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.89 | 17.14 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers