Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCWX vs VTSMX
JLCWX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts JLCWX vs VTSMX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R6
Price$73.78
Change-$0.31 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.91B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$149.45
Change-$0.63 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
JLCWX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCWX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCWX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. JLCWX (5.91B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than JLCWX: VTSMX (1.12) vs JLCWX (0.59). JLCWX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: JLCWX (14 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). JLCWX (0.67) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). JLCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). VTSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than JLCWX: VTSMX (3000) vs JLCWX (1000000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. JLCWX (-2.89). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 92.31 vs. JLCWX (40.05).
| JLCWX | VTSMX | JLCWX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.14 | 471% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.14 | 479% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.472 | 6.485 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.91B | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.12 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.89 | 12.70 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.60 | 62.32 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.05 | 92.31 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.25 | 192.56 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement