JMIA
Price
$4.41
Change
-$0.26 (-5.57%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
540.06M
41 days until earnings call
LITB
Price
$1.16
Change
-$0.05 (-4.17%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JMIA vs LITB

Header iconJMIA vs LITB Comparison
Open Charts JMIA vs LITBBanner chart's image
Jumia Technologies AG
Price$4.41
Change-$0.26 (-5.57%)
Volume$54.46K
Capitalization540.06M
LightInTheBox Holding
Price$1.16
Change-$0.05 (-4.17%)
Volume$100
Capitalization21.11M
JMIA vs LITB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JMIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JMIA vs. LITB commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JMIA is a StrongBuy and LITB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (JMIA: $4.67 vs. LITB: $1.20)
Brand notoriety: JMIA: Notable vs. LITB: Not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JMIA: 451% vs. LITB: 61%
Market capitalization -- JMIA: $571.9M vs. LITB: $21.93M
JMIA [@Internet Retail] is valued at $571.9M. LITB’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $21.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $45.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JMIA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLITB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JMIA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LITB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JMIA is a better buy in the long-term than LITB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JMIA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LITB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JMIA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LITB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both JMIA and LITB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

JMIA (@Internet Retail) experienced а +35.36% price change this week, while LITB (@Internet Retail) price change was +6.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

JMIA is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

LITB is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+4.47% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JMIA($540M) has a higher market cap than LITB($21.1M). JMIA YTD gains are higher at: 22.251 vs. LITB (-28.571). LITB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.42M vs. JMIA (-94.67M). JMIA has more cash in the bank: 111M vs. LITB (15.9M). LITB has less debt than JMIA: LITB (8.45M) vs JMIA (12.3M). LITB has higher revenues than JMIA: LITB (231M) vs JMIA (155M).
JMIALITBJMIA / LITB
Capitalization540M21.1M2,559%
EBITDA-94.67M1.42M-6,667%
Gain YTD22.251-28.571-78%
P/E RatioN/A9.63-
Revenue155M231M67%
Total Cash111M15.9M698%
Total Debt12.3M8.45M146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JMIA vs LITB: Fundamental Ratings
JMIA
LITB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
273
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3992
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a5

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JMIA's Valuation (45) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LITB (99) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that JMIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LITB’s over the last 12 months.

JMIA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as LITB (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that JMIA’s stock grew similarly to LITB’s over the last 12 months.

JMIA's SMR Rating (98) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as LITB (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that JMIA’s stock grew similarly to LITB’s over the last 12 months.

JMIA's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LITB (92) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that JMIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LITB’s over the last 12 months.

LITB's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JMIA (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that LITB’s stock grew somewhat faster than JMIA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JMIALITB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JMIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDGRX29.720.35
+1.19%
BlackRock Natural Resources Inv A
FSIDX17.48N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
HSMBX36.85N/A
N/A
Horizon Multi-Factor Small/Mid Cap Adv
FMFMX16.92N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Gr
CMIRX8.52N/A
N/A
Conestoga Discovery Institutional

JMIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JMIA has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JMIA jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JMIA
1D Price
Change %
JMIA100%
+16.17%
CVNA - JMIA
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
TDUP - JMIA
55%
Loosely correlated
+4.01%
PDD - JMIA
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
GLBE - JMIA
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
W - JMIA
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
More

LITB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LITB and BZUN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LITB and BZUN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITB
1D Price
Change %
LITB100%
+4.62%
BZUN - LITB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPNG - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
RERE - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.72%
JMIA - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
+16.17%
W - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
More