JMPHF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.04 (-66.67%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.77M
TPGVF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

JMPHF vs TPGVF

Header iconJMPHF vs TPGVF Comparison
Open Charts JMPHF vs TPGVFBanner chart's image
Leveljump Healthcare
Price$0.02
Change-$0.04 (-66.67%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.77M
Top Glove
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13K
Capitalization1.18B
JMPHF vs TPGVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TPGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JMPHF vs. TPGVF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JMPHF is a Hold and TPGVF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (JMPHF: $0.02 vs. TPGVF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: JMPHF and TPGVF are both not notable
JMPHF represents the Medical Specialties, while TPGVF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JMPHF: 100% vs. TPGVF: 174%
Market capitalization -- JMPHF: $1.77M vs. TPGVF: $1.18B
JMPHF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $1.77M. TPGVF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $1.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $172.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $10.48B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $11.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JMPHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTPGVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JMPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TPGVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TPGVF is a better buy in the long-term than JMPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TPGVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TPGVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

JMPHF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TPGVF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.62%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+3.75% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.53% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TPGVF($1.18B) has a higher market cap than JMPHF($1.77M). JMPHF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. TPGVF (-47.384). TPGVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 426M vs. JMPHF (-271.38K). TPGVF has more cash in the bank: 528M vs. JMPHF (359K). JMPHF has less debt than TPGVF: JMPHF (9.13M) vs TPGVF (1.01B). TPGVF has higher revenues than JMPHF: TPGVF (3.43B) vs JMPHF (15.1M).
JMPHFTPGVFJMPHF / TPGVF
Capitalization1.77M1.18B0%
EBITDA-271.38K426M-0%
Gain YTD0.000-47.384-
P/E RatioN/A85.73-
Revenue15.1M3.43B0%
Total Cash359K528M0%
Total Debt9.13M1.01B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TPGVF: Fundamental Ratings
TPGVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
45
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JMPHFTPGVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TPGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNNA10.67-0.03
-0.28%
Hennessy Advisors
PRSO0.88N/A
-0.46%
Peraso
EBF18.06-0.17
-0.93%
Ennis
SQM45.08-0.46
-1.01%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
HUBG35.49-0.44
-1.22%
Hub Group

JMPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JMPHF and SAFLF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JMPHF and SAFLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JMPHF
1D Price
Change %
JMPHF100%
N/A
SAFLF - JMPHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TPGVF - JMPHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVCRF - JMPHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-27.51%
FEMY - JMPHF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
NMTC - JMPHF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
More

TPGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TPGVF and VVOS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TPGVF and VVOS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPGVF
1D Price
Change %
TPGVF100%
N/A
VVOS - TPGVF
32%
Poorly correlated
-10.85%
BCCOY - TPGVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFTSF - TPGVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMPHF - TPGVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLLKF - TPGVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More