JMPLF vs JMPLY
To understand the difference between Johnson Matthey plc (JMPLF) vs. Johnson Matthey plc - ADR (JMPLY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JMPLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJMPLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- JMPLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- JMPLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JMPLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JMPLY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- JMPLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
- JMPLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
JMPLF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JMPLY (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -6.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
JMPLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.47% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| JMPLF | JMPLY | JMPLF / JMPLY | |
| Capitalization | 4.25B | 4.25B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 621M | 621M | 100% |
| Gain YTD | -9.014 | -16.176 | 56% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.22 | 12.50 | 98% |
| Revenue | 14.9B | 14.9B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 650M | 650M | 100% |
| Total Debt | 1.66B | 1.66B | 100% |
JMPLF | JMPLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JMPLY's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as JMPLF (33). This means that JMPLY’s stock grew similarly to JMPLF’s over the last 12 months.
JMPLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JMPLF (100). This means that JMPLY’s stock grew similarly to JMPLF’s over the last 12 months.
JMPLY's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as JMPLF (92). This means that JMPLY’s stock grew similarly to JMPLF’s over the last 12 months.
JMPLF's Price Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as JMPLY (76). This means that JMPLF’s stock grew similarly to JMPLY’s over the last 12 months.
JMPLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JMPLY (100). This means that JMPLF’s stock grew similarly to JMPLY’s over the last 12 months.
| JMPLF | JMPLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 63% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QDVCX | 12.71 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
| EquityCompass Quality Dividend C | |||
| WIIGX | 21.22 | -0.04 | -0.19% |
| Wasatch International Growth Instl | |||
| PAAEX | 17.86 | -0.06 | -0.33% |
| Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R6 | |||
| PGLRX | 15.28 | -0.07 | -0.46% |
| Putnam Focused International Equity R | |||
| JMGZX | 45.99 | -0.42 | -0.90% |
| JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R2 | |||
JMPLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JMPLF and IOFNF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JMPLF and IOFNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JMPLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMPLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IOFNF - JMPLF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| INDOY - JMPLF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KBLB - JMPLF | 10% Poorly correlated | +6.35% | ||
| KANKF - JMPLF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JMPLY - JMPLF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
More | ||||
JMPLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JMPLY has been loosely correlated with COIHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JMPLY jumps, then COIHY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JMPLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMPLY | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| COIHY - JMPLY | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| SXYAY - JMPLY | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| BASFY - JMPLY | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| AKZOY - JMPLY | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| ARKAY - JMPLY | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||