Advertisement
JMSB vs JPHLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JMSB is a Hold and JPHLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JMSB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJPHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- JMSB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- JPHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JMSB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JPHLF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).
- JMSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- JPHLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
JMSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.57% price change this week, while JPHLF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
JMSB is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.22% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| JMSB | JPHLF | JMSB / JPHLF | |
| Capitalization | 244M | 25.5B | 1% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.532 | -2.643 | 96% |
| P/E Ratio | 47.78 | 8.41 | 568% |
| Revenue | 35.5M | 11.14T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 8.01M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 29.2M | 2.13T | 0% |
JMSB | JPHLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JPHLF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JMSB (63). This means that JPHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JMSB’s over the last 12 months.
JMSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JPHLF (100). This means that JMSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than JPHLF’s over the last 12 months.
JMSB's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JPHLF (100). This means that JMSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than JPHLF’s over the last 12 months.
JMSB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as JPHLF (75). This means that JMSB’s stock grew similarly to JPHLF’s over the last 12 months.
JPHLF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as JMSB (100). This means that JPHLF’s stock grew similarly to JMSB’s over the last 12 months.
| JMSB | JPHLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 25% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 29% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 22% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 35% |
Advertisement
JMSB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JMSB has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JMSB jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JMSB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMSB | 100% | +1.53% | ||
| SNV - JMSB | 67% Closely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| UBSI - JMSB | 67% Closely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| PEBO - JMSB | 66% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| CTBI - JMSB | 66% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| NFBK - JMSB | 66% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||
JPHLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPHLF has been loosely correlated with JPSTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JPHLF jumps, then JPSTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JPHLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPHLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| JPSTF - JPHLF | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MDIBF - JPHLF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JMSB - JPHLF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
| JYSKY - JPHLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JFWV - JPHLF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||