JMSB
Price
$18.77
Change
-$0.07 (-0.37%)
Updated
Jun 27, 12:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
243.77M
JPHLF
Price
$9.32
Change
-$0.06 (-0.64%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
25.54B
Interact to see
Advertisement

JMSB vs JPHLF

Header iconJMSB vs JPHLF Comparison
Open Charts JMSB vs JPHLFBanner chart's image
John Marshall Ban
Price$18.77
Change-$0.07 (-0.37%)
Volume$398
Capitalization243.77M
JAPAN POST
Price$9.32
Change-$0.06 (-0.64%)
Volume$1.36K
Capitalization25.54B
JMSB vs JPHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JMSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JMSB vs. JPHLF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JMSB is a StrongBuy and JPHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (JMSB: $18.84 vs. JPHLF: $9.32)
Brand notoriety: JMSB and JPHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JMSB: 39% vs. JPHLF: 181%
Market capitalization -- JMSB: $243.77M vs. JPHLF: $25.54B
JMSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $243.77M. JPHLF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JMSB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJPHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JMSB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JPHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JMSB is a better buy in the long-term than JPHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JMSB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • JMSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

JMSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.02% price change this week, while JPHLF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

JMSB is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPHLF($25.5B) has a higher market cap than JMSB($244M). JMSB has higher P/E ratio than JPHLF: JMSB (47.78) vs JPHLF (8.41). JPHLF YTD gains are higher at: -1.427 vs. JMSB (-6.175). JMSB has less debt than JPHLF: JMSB (29.2M) vs JPHLF (2.13T). JPHLF has higher revenues than JMSB: JPHLF (11.14T) vs JMSB (35.5M).
JMSBJPHLFJMSB / JPHLF
Capitalization244M25.5B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.175-1.427433%
P/E Ratio47.788.41568%
Revenue35.5M11.14T0%
Total Cash8.01MN/A-
Total Debt29.2M2.13T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JMSB vs JPHLF: Fundamental Ratings
JMSB
JPHLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1733
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62100
SMR RATING
1..100
50100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10090
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a27

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JPHLF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JMSB (65). This means that JPHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

JMSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JPHLF (100). This means that JMSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than JPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

JMSB's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JPHLF (100). This means that JMSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than JPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

JMSB's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as JPHLF (57). This means that JMSB’s stock grew similarly to JPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

JPHLF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as JMSB (100). This means that JPHLF’s stock grew similarly to JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JMSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JMSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGRYX135.39N/A
N/A
AB Growth Advisor
PFRSX28.34N/A
N/A
Principal Real Estate Securities Fd R6
ARRQX21.93N/A
N/A
Aristotle Value Equity R6
NMMEX16.80N/A
N/A
Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity
RCKSX20.77N/A
N/A
Rock Oak Core Growth

JMSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JMSB has been closely correlated with VBTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JMSB jumps, then VBTX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JMSB
1D Price
Change %
JMSB100%
+1.40%
VBTX - JMSB
67%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
UBSI - JMSB
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
FMBH - JMSB
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.65%
UVSP - JMSB
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
PEBO - JMSB
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
More

JPHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPHLF has been loosely correlated with JPSTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JPHLF jumps, then JPSTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPHLF
1D Price
Change %
JPHLF100%
N/A
JPSTF - JPHLF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
MDIBF - JPHLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMSB - JPHLF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
JYSKY - JPHLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFWV - JPHLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More