JMSB
Price
$17.70
Change
-$0.63 (-3.44%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
243.77M
JUVF
Price
$13.00
Change
+$0.10 (+0.78%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
71.55M
Ad is loading...

JMSB vs JUVF

Header iconJMSB vs JUVF Comparison
Open Charts JMSB vs JUVFBanner chart's image
John Marshall Ban
Price$17.70
Change-$0.63 (-3.44%)
Volume$32.1K
Capitalization243.77M
Juniata Valley Financial
Price$13.00
Change+$0.10 (+0.78%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization71.55M
JMSB vs JUVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
JMSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JMSB vs. JUVF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JMSB is a Hold and JUVF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (JMSB: $17.70 vs. JUVF: $13.00)
Brand notoriety: JMSB and JUVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JMSB: 180% vs. JUVF: 97%
Market capitalization -- JMSB: $243.77M vs. JUVF: $71.55M
JMSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $243.77M. JUVF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $71.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JMSB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJUVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JMSB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JUVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JUVF is a better buy in the long-term than JMSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JMSB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • JMSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

JMSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -10.06% price change this week, while JUVF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

JMSB is expected to report earnings on Apr 19, 2023.

JUVF is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JMSB($244M) has a higher market cap than JUVF($71.5M). JMSB has higher P/E ratio than JUVF: JMSB (47.78) vs JUVF (9.78). JUVF YTD gains are higher at: 1.599 vs. JMSB (-11.853). JUVF has more cash in the bank: 11.7M vs. JMSB (8.01M). JMSB has less debt than JUVF: JMSB (29.2M) vs JUVF (54M). JMSB has higher revenues than JUVF: JMSB (35.5M) vs JUVF (29.2M).
JMSBJUVFJMSB / JUVF
Capitalization244M71.5M341%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.8531.599-741%
P/E Ratio47.789.78489%
Revenue35.5M29.2M122%
Total Cash8.01M11.7M68%
Total Debt29.2M54M54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JMSB vs JUVF: Fundamental Ratings
JMSB
JUVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99100
SMR RATING
1..100
5147
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9830
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JUVF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as JMSB (75). This means that JUVF’s stock grew similarly to JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

JMSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as JUVF (100). This means that JMSB’s stock grew similarly to JUVF’s over the last 12 months.

JUVF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as JMSB (51). This means that JUVF’s stock grew similarly to JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

JUVF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as JMSB (63). This means that JUVF’s stock grew similarly to JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

JUVF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JMSB (98). This means that JUVF’s stock grew significantly faster than JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JMSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
JMSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OP.X1.1440350.055622
+5.11%
Optimism cryptocurrency
SUSHI.X0.9041630.028635
+3.27%
SushiSwap cryptocurrency
POLS.X0.2876080.006853
+2.44%
Polkastarter cryptocurrency
DREP.X0.0026390.000002
+0.06%
Drep [new] cryptocurrency
NMR.X11.143037-0.045704
-0.41%
Numeraire cryptocurrency

JMSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JMSB has been loosely correlated with FCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JMSB jumps, then FCBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JMSB
1D Price
Change %
JMSB100%
-3.44%
FCBC - JMSB
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
BHB - JMSB
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
BFC - JMSB
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
PFIS - JMSB
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
VBTX - JMSB
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
More

JUVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUVF and EGFEF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUVF and EGFEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUVF
1D Price
Change %
JUVF100%
+0.78%
EGFEF - JUVF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.87%
SVBT - JUVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFSG - JUVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMSB - JUVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.44%
ITCFY - JUVF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More