Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JNBZX vs UCMCX
JNBZX vs UCMCX Comparison
Open Charts JNBZX vs UCMCX
JPMorgan Income Builder R6
Price$10.37
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.39B
Victory Cornerstone Moderately Cnsrv
Price$11.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets184.63M
JNBZX vs UCMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JNBZX vs. UCMCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JNBZX is a Hold and UCMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNBZX has more cash in the bank: 8.39B vs. UCMCX (185M). JNBZX pays higher dividends than UCMCX: JNBZX (5.64) vs UCMCX (1.70). JNBZX was incepted earlier than UCMCX: JNBZX (8 years) vs UCMCX (13 years). UCMCX (1.31) is less costly to investors than JNBZX (0.57). JNBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. UCMCX (48.00). UCMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNBZX: UCMCX (500) vs JNBZX (15000000). UCMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. JNBZX (9.95). JNBZX return over 5 years is better than : 20.95 vs. UCMCX (8.65).
| JNBZX | UCMCX | JNBZX / UCMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.18 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.31 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.037 | 11.640 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000000 | 500 | 3,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.39B | 185M | 4,537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.64 | 1.70 | 331% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.95 | 10.76 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.16 | 19.77 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.95 | 8.65 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers