Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JNGLX vs LHCCX
JNGLX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JNGLX vs. LHCCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JNGLX is a Buy and LHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.66B vs. LHCCX (7.15M). JNGLX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: JNGLX (0.34) vs LHCCX (0.00). JNGLX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: JNGLX (26 years) vs LHCCX (6 years). LHCCX (4.09) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). LHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: LHCCX (1500) vs JNGLX (2500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.10 vs. JNGLX (-14.56). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 6.56 vs. LHCCX (-1.64).
| JNGLX | LHCCX | JNGLX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.78 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 4.09 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.260 | -8.750 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1500 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.66B | 7.15M | 65,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.56 | -9.10 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.57 | 4.42 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.56 | -1.64 | -400% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement