Ad is loading...
JNGLX vs LHCCX
JNGLX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JNGLX vs. LHCCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JNGLX is a Hold and LHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.71B vs. LHCCX (7.15M). JNGLX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: JNGLX (0.34) vs LHCCX (0.00). JNGLX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: JNGLX (26 years) vs LHCCX (6 years). LHCCX (4.28) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). LHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: LHCCX (1500) vs JNGLX (2500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.62 vs. JNGLX (-15.05). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 13.52 vs. LHCCX (6.02).
| JNGLX | LHCCX | JNGLX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.78 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 4.28 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.088 | -13.859 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1500 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.71B | 7.15M | 65,953% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.05 | -13.62 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.19 | -14.37 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.52 | 6.02 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers