JNNDF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
541.07M
MNBEF
Price
$14.05
Change
-$0.14 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
6.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

JNNDF vs MNBEF

Header iconJNNDF vs MNBEF Comparison
Open Charts JNNDF vs MNBEFBanner chart's image
Japan Display
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.51K
Capitalization541.07M
Minebea Mitsumi
Price$14.05
Change-$0.14 (-0.99%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.11B
JNNDF vs MNBEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JNNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNBEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JNNDF vs. MNBEF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JNNDF is a Hold and MNBEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (JNNDF: $0.13 vs. MNBEF: $14.05)
Brand notoriety: JNNDF and MNBEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JNNDF: 226% vs. MNBEF: 94%
Market capitalization -- JNNDF: $541.07M vs. MNBEF: $6.11B
JNNDF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $541.07M. MNBEF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $6.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $120.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JNNDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNBEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JNNDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNBEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNBEF is a better buy in the long-term than JNNDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JNNDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNBEF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JNNDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MNBEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both JNNDF and MNBEF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

JNNDF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNBEF (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.58% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNBEF($6.11B) has a higher market cap than JNNDF($541M). JNNDF YTD gains are higher at: 5.812 vs. MNBEF (-12.187). MNBEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 158B vs. JNNDF (-24.23B). MNBEF has more cash in the bank: 168B vs. JNNDF (24.3B). JNNDF has less debt than MNBEF: JNNDF (44B) vs MNBEF (419B). MNBEF has higher revenues than JNNDF: MNBEF (1.51T) vs JNNDF (222B).
JNNDFMNBEFJNNDF / MNBEF
Capitalization541M6.11B9%
EBITDA-24.23B158B-15%
Gain YTD5.812-12.187-48%
P/E RatioN/A13.66-
Revenue222B1.51T15%
Total Cash24.3B168B14%
Total Debt44B419B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JNNDF vs MNBEF: Fundamental Ratings
JNNDF
MNBEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5278
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6491
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNBEF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JNNDF (79). This means that MNBEF’s stock grew significantly faster than JNNDF’s over the last 12 months.

MNBEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JNNDF (100). This means that MNBEF’s stock grew similarly to JNNDF’s over the last 12 months.

MNBEF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JNNDF (100). This means that MNBEF’s stock grew similarly to JNNDF’s over the last 12 months.

JNNDF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as MNBEF (78). This means that JNNDF’s stock grew similarly to MNBEF’s over the last 12 months.

JNNDF's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as MNBEF (91). This means that JNNDF’s stock grew similarly to MNBEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JNNDFMNBEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JNNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNBEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEF6.010.07
+1.18%
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund Inc.
QQXT99.940.30
+0.30%
First Trust NASDAQ-100 ex-Tech Sect ETF
PXE28.880.01
+0.04%
Invesco Energy Exploration & Prod ETF
NBCC27.52N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Nxt Gen Cnnctd Cnsm ETF
QMAG22.23N/A
N/A
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - Aug

JNNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JNNDF has been loosely correlated with VARXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JNNDF jumps, then VARXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JNNDF
1D Price
Change %
JNNDF100%
N/A
VARXF - JNNDF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRSEF - JNNDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEHC - JNNDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - JNNDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNPKF - JNNDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNBEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNBEF and AITUY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNBEF and AITUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNBEF
1D Price
Change %
MNBEF100%
N/A
AITUY - MNBEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRSEF - MNBEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEHC - MNBEF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KULR - MNBEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
JNNDF - MNBEF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More