JNPKF
Price
$22.45
Change
-$1.65 (-6.85%)
Updated
Feb 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
KGBLY
Price
$15.31
Change
-$15.30 (-49.98%)
Updated
Apr 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.29B
Ad is loading...

JNPKF vs KGBLY

Header iconJNPKF vs KGBLY Comparison
Open Charts JNPKF vs KGBLYBanner chart's image
Jenoptik AG
Price$22.45
Change-$1.65 (-6.85%)
Volume$969
Capitalization1.13B
Kingboard Laminates Holdings
Price$15.31
Change-$15.30 (-49.98%)
Volume$2.79K
Capitalization3.29B
JNPKF vs KGBLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JNPKF vs. KGBLY commentary
Apr 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JNPKF is a Hold and KGBLY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2025
Stock price -- (JNPKF: $22.45 vs. KGBLY: $15.31)
Brand notoriety: JNPKF and KGBLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JNPKF: 100% vs. KGBLY: 450%
Market capitalization -- JNPKF: $1.13B vs. KGBLY: $3.29B
JNPKF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $1.13B. KGBLY’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $3.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $91.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JNPKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKGBLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JNPKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KGBLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both JNPKF and KGBLY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

JNPKF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KGBLY (@Electronic Components) price change was -49.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +4.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+4.44% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGBLY($3.29B) has a higher market cap than JNPKF($1.13B). JNPKF has higher P/E ratio than KGBLY: JNPKF (12.44) vs KGBLY (11.18). JNPKF YTD gains are higher at: -10.736 vs. KGBLY (-19.378). KGBLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.88B vs. JNPKF (218M). KGBLY has higher revenues than JNPKF: KGBLY (17.3B) vs JNPKF (1.11B).
JNPKFKGBLYJNPKF / KGBLY
Capitalization1.13B3.29B34%
EBITDA218M1.88B12%
Gain YTD-10.736-19.37855%
P/E Ratio12.4411.18111%
Revenue1.11B17.3B6%
Total Cash63.8MN/A-
Total Debt480MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JNPKF: Fundamental Ratings
JNPKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
71
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISTNX66.640.80
+1.22%
Macquarie Science and Technology R6
MXLSX34.11N/A
N/A
Empower Small Cap Value Inv
LONAX13.98N/A
N/A
Longboard A
BMSRX13.02N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq R1
FWRCX10.65N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Global Real Estate C

JNPKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JNPKF and JPDYY have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JNPKF and JPDYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JNPKF
1D Price
Change %
JNPKF100%
N/A
JPDYY - JNPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNNDF - JNPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRSEF - JNPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IACYF - JNPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBIDF - JNPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGBLY and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGBLY and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGBLY
1D Price
Change %
KGBLY100%
N/A
IEHC - KGBLY
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
KULR - KGBLY
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
IBIDF - KGBLY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNPKF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More