It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JOE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMAX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JOE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMAX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
JOE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -4.48% price change this week, while RMAX (@Real Estate Development) price change was -7.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.00%.
JOE is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
RMAX is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
JOE | RMAX | JOE / RMAX | |
Capitalization | 3.38B | 160M | 2,115% |
EBITDA | 169M | 26.6M | 635% |
Gain YTD | -25.275 | -17.104 | 148% |
P/E Ratio | 43.22 | 1111.11 | 4% |
Revenue | 389M | 326M | 119% |
Total Cash | 86.1M | 82.6M | 104% |
Total Debt | 633M | 484M | 131% |
JOE | RMAX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JOE's Valuation (79) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RMAX (90). This means that JOE’s stock grew similarly to RMAX’s over the last 12 months.
JOE's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMAX (100). This means that JOE’s stock grew significantly faster than RMAX’s over the last 12 months.
JOE's SMR Rating (70) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RMAX (89). This means that JOE’s stock grew similarly to RMAX’s over the last 12 months.
RMAX's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JOE (84). This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to JOE’s over the last 12 months.
RMAX's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JOE (45). This means that RMAX’s stock grew somewhat faster than JOE’s over the last 12 months.
JOE | RMAX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago66% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago72% | 27 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JOE has been loosely correlated with HHH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JOE jumps, then HHH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JOE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
JOE | 100% | +1.71% | ||
HHH - JOE | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
MMI - JOE | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
FOR - JOE | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
OPEN - JOE | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
STHO - JOE | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.51% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMAX has been closely correlated with HOUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMAX jumps, then HOUS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RMAX | 100% | +3.95% | ||
HOUS - RMAX | 67% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
RDFN - RMAX | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.58% | ||
EXPI - RMAX | 57% Loosely correlated | +10.52% | ||
OPEN - RMAX | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
JOE - RMAX | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More |