JPPHY
Price
$9.12
Change
-$0.20 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
25.54B
KBCSF
Price
$99.94
Change
+$0.94 (+0.95%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
31.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

JPPHY vs KBCSF

Header iconJPPHY vs KBCSF Comparison
Open Charts JPPHY vs KBCSFBanner chart's image
JAPAN POST
Price$9.12
Change-$0.20 (-2.15%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization25.54B
KBC Group SA
Price$99.94
Change+$0.94 (+0.95%)
Volume$370
Capitalization31.45B
JPPHY vs KBCSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JPPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KBCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JPPHY vs. KBCSF commentary
Jul 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPPHY is a Hold and KBCSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 15, 2025
Stock price -- (JPPHY: $9.12 vs. KBCSF: $99.94)
Brand notoriety: JPPHY and KBCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPPHY: 411% vs. KBCSF: 67%
Market capitalization -- JPPHY: $25.54B vs. KBCSF: $31.45B
JPPHY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.54B. KBCSF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $31.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPPHY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKBCSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JPPHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KBCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KBCSF is a better buy in the long-term than JPPHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPPHY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KBCSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPPHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KBCSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KBCSF is a better buy in the short-term than JPPHY.

Price Growth

JPPHY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.15% price change this week, while KBCSF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

JPPHY is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.77% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KBCSF($31.5B) has a higher market cap than JPPHY($25.5B). KBCSF (8.83) and JPPHY (8.60) have similar P/E ratio . KBCSF YTD gains are higher at: 27.899 vs. JPPHY (-7.481). KBCSF has less debt than JPPHY: KBCSF (20.9B) vs JPPHY (2.13T). JPPHY has higher revenues than KBCSF: JPPHY (11.14T) vs KBCSF (8.62B).
JPPHYKBCSFJPPHY / KBCSF
Capitalization25.5B31.5B81%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.48127.899-27%
P/E Ratio8.608.8397%
Revenue11.14T8.62B129,253%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.13T20.9B10,172%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPPHY vs KBCSF: Fundamental Ratings
JPPHY
KBCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
1006
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9345
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JPPHY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KBCSF (73). This means that JPPHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KBCSF’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JPPHY (100). This means that KBCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JPPHY’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JPPHY (100). This means that KBCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than JPPHY’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as JPPHY (60). This means that KBCSF’s stock grew similarly to JPPHY’s over the last 12 months.

KBCSF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JPPHY (93). This means that KBCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JPPHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPPHYKBCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JPPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KBCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ONDS2.310.19
+8.96%
Ondas Holdings
GLAD28.840.32
+1.12%
Gladstone Capital Corp
PAG183.02-0.05
-0.03%
Penske Automotive Group
VRNT20.07-0.66
-3.18%
Verint Systems
PTIX3.57-0.12
-3.25%
Protagenic Therapeutics Inc

JPPHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JPPHY and PGNN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JPPHY and PGNN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPPHY
1D Price
Change %
JPPHY100%
N/A
PGNN - JPPHY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - JPPHY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMAK - JPPHY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBCSF - JPPHY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFIN - JPPHY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KBCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KBCSF and PONT have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KBCSF and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KBCSF
1D Price
Change %
KBCSF100%
N/A
PONT - KBCSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIBGY - KBCSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
BNPQF - KBCSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPPHY - KBCSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNKHF - KBCSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More