JPPIF
Price
$19.09
Change
-$1.11 (-5.50%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Capitalization
5.98B
LINS
Price
$20.00
Change
-$4.01 (-16.70%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
3.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JPPIF vs LINS

Header iconJPPIF vs LINS Comparison
Open Charts JPPIF vs LINSBanner chart's image
Japan Post Ins
Price$19.09
Change-$1.11 (-5.50%)
Volume$600
Capitalization5.98B
Life Insurance Co. Of Alabama
Price$20.00
Change-$4.01 (-16.70%)
Volume$12
Capitalization3.97M
JPPIF vs LINS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JPPIF vs. LINS commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPPIF is a Hold and LINS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (JPPIF: $19.09 vs. LINS: $20.00)
Brand notoriety: JPPIF and LINS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPPIF: 100% vs. LINS: 3%
Market capitalization -- JPPIF: $5.98B vs. LINS: $3.97M
JPPIF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $5.98B. LINS’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $3.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPPIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLINS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JPPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JPPIF is a better buy in the long-term than LINS.

Price Growth

JPPIF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LINS (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -16.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.52% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPPIF($5.98B) has a higher market cap than LINS($3.97M). JPPIF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. LINS (-74.522).
JPPIFLINSJPPIF / LINS
Capitalization5.98B3.97M150,756%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-74.522-
P/E Ratio8.50N/A-
Revenue3.1TN/A-
Total Cash1.44TN/A-
Total Debt300BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LINS: Fundamental Ratings
LINS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OGMCX34.39N/A
N/A
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals C
HNCRX19.60N/A
N/A
Hartford International Growth R3
IRMCX9.87N/A
N/A
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S
TAAGX11.92N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan Small/Mid Cap Growth Cl A
RPTIX98.07N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I

JPPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPPIF has been loosely correlated with SGCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JPPIF jumps, then SGCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPPIF
1D Price
Change %
JPPIF100%
N/A
SGCFF - JPPIF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LINSA - JPPIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LINS - JPPIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFIPA - JPPIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUHYF - JPPIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LINS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LINS and LINSA have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LINS and LINSA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LINS
1D Price
Change %
LINS100%
N/A
LINSA - LINS
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JXN - LINS
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
AFIPA - LINS
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUHYF - LINS
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPPIF - LINS
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A