Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JSLCX vs PACAX
JSLCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JSLCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R4
Price$12.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets568.96M
JSLCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JSLCX vs. PACAX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JSLCX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JSLCX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. PACAX (569M). JSLCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: JSLCX (3.85) vs PACAX (3.66). JSLCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JSLCX (20 years) vs PACAX (32 years). JSLCX (1.17) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JSLCX (16.00). JSLCX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. PACAX (7.02). PACAX (8.56) and JSLCX (8.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| JSLCX | PACAX | JSLCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.00 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.00 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.502 | 6.077 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 569M | 278% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 3.66 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | 7.02 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.78 | 16.45 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.43 | 8.56 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.60 | 23.38 | 105% |