Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JTLRX vs PACAX
JTLRX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JTLRX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R5
Price$12.32
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.34
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets587.04M
JTLRX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JTLRX vs. PACAX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JTLRX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JTLRX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. PACAX (587M). JTLRX pays higher dividends than PACAX: JTLRX (4.01) vs PACAX (3.15). JTLRX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JTLRX (20 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than JTLRX (0.87). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JTLRX (16.00). JTLRX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JTLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. PACAX (6.41). JTLRX (11.50) and PACAX (11.24) have equivalent 5 years return.
| JTLRX | PACAX | JTLRX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.00 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.00 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.178 | 9.059 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 587M | 270% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.01 | 3.15 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.24 | 6.41 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.52 | 29.10 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.50 | 11.24 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.39 | 28.61 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement