JUBPF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
260.43M
TIGCF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JUBPF vs TIGCF

Header iconJUBPF vs TIGCF Comparison
Open Charts JUBPF vs TIGCFBanner chart's image
Jubilee Metals Group
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$28K
Capitalization260.43M
Triumph Gold
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$207.81K
Capitalization2.03M
JUBPF vs TIGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JUBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JUBPF vs. TIGCF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JUBPF is a Buy and TIGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (JUBPF: $0.06 vs. TIGCF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: JUBPF and TIGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JUBPF: 41% vs. TIGCF: 560%
Market capitalization -- JUBPF: $260.43M vs. TIGCF: $2.03M
JUBPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $260.43M. TIGCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JUBPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JUBPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TIGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both JUBPF and TIGCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JUBPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JUBPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TIGCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JUBPF is a better buy in the short-term than TIGCF.

Price Growth

JUBPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TIGCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUBPF($260M) has a higher market cap than TIGCF($2.04M). JUBPF YTD gains are higher at: 36.471 vs. TIGCF (4.013). JUBPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 34.2M vs. TIGCF (-1.77M). JUBPF has more cash in the bank: 11.7M vs. TIGCF (5.99K). TIGCF has less debt than JUBPF: TIGCF (0) vs JUBPF (16.1M). JUBPF has higher revenues than TIGCF: JUBPF (140M) vs TIGCF (0).
JUBPFTIGCFJUBPF / TIGCF
Capitalization260M2.04M12,776%
EBITDA34.2M-1.77M-1,931%
Gain YTD36.4714.013909%
P/E Ratio15.85N/A-
Revenue140M0-
Total Cash11.7M5.99K195,228%
Total Debt16.1M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JUBPF vs TIGCF: Fundamental Ratings
JUBPF
TIGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4551
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
7894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TIGCF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JUBPF (88). This means that TIGCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JUBPF’s over the last 12 months.

JUBPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as TIGCF (100). This means that JUBPF’s stock grew similarly to TIGCF’s over the last 12 months.

JUBPF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as TIGCF (94). This means that JUBPF’s stock grew similarly to TIGCF’s over the last 12 months.

JUBPF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as TIGCF (49). This means that JUBPF’s stock grew similarly to TIGCF’s over the last 12 months.

JUBPF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TIGCF (100). This means that JUBPF’s stock grew significantly faster than TIGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JUBPFTIGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JUBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REPX27.200.97
+3.70%
Riley Exploration Permian
BHR2.520.03
+1.20%
Braemar Hotels & Resorts
UPXI2.89N/A
N/A
Upexi Inc
ES64.45-0.10
-0.15%
Eversource Energy
NSA32.53-0.15
-0.46%
National Storage Affiliates Trust

JUBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUBPF and PXCLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUBPF and PXCLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUBPF
1D Price
Change %
JUBPF100%
N/A
PXCLF - JUBPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+80.59%
FLMCF - JUBPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIGCF - JUBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.98%
DNN - JUBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
ENCTF - JUBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TIGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TIGCF and YLLXF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TIGCF and YLLXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGCF
1D Price
Change %
TIGCF100%
-5.98%
YLLXF - TIGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.77%
HDRSF - TIGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.11%
JUBPF - TIGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRSPF - TIGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.77%
TLGRF - TIGCF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
More