Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JULCX vs PACAX
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JULCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R6
Price$12.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets592.96M
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JULCX vs. PACAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JULCX is a Hold and PACAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JULCX has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. PACAX (593M). JULCX (4.03) and PACAX (4.02) have matching dividends . JULCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JULCX (14 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than JULCX (0.82). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JULCX (15.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JULCX: PACAX (0) vs JULCX (1000000). JULCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. PACAX (6.47). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.60 vs. JULCX (9.13).
| JULCX | PACAX | JULCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.870 | 8.864 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 593M | 261% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.03 | 4.02 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.30 | 6.47 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.20 | 24.69 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.13 | 9.60 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.84 | 27.52 | 116% |