Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JULCX vs PACAX
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JULCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R6
Price$12.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.01
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets570.48M
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JULCX vs. PACAX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JULCX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JULCX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. PACAX (570M). JULCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: JULCX (4.10) vs PACAX (3.66). JULCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JULCX (14 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than JULCX (0.82). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JULCX (16.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JULCX: PACAX (0) vs JULCX (1000000). JULCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. PACAX (5.36). JULCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.21 vs. PACAX (7.77).
| JULCX | PACAX | JULCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.200 | 5.308 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 570M | 278% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.10 | 3.66 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.61 | 5.36 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.06 | 15.83 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.21 | 7.77 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.04 | 22.71 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement