Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JULCX vs PACAX
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JULCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R6
Price$11.96
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.97M
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JULCX vs. PACAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JULCX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JULCX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. PACAX (562M). JULCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: JULCX (4.22) vs PACAX (3.25). JULCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JULCX (14 years) vs PACAX (31 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than JULCX (0.82). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JULCX (16.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JULCX: PACAX (0) vs JULCX (1000000). JULCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.57 vs. PACAX (5.10). JULCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.63 vs. PACAX (8.81).
| JULCX | PACAX | JULCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.148 | 2.965 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 562M | 281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.22 | 3.25 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.57 | 5.10 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.66 | 11.70 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.63 | 8.81 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.41 | 20.67 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement