Ad is loading...
JULCX vs PACAX
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JULCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R6
Price$11.85
Change+$0.05 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.67
Change+$0.08 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets556.65M
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JULCX vs. PACAX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JULCX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JULCX has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. PACAX (557M). JULCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: JULCX (4.27) vs PACAX (3.51). JULCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JULCX (14 years) vs PACAX (31 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than JULCX (0.82). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JULCX (16.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JULCX: PACAX (0) vs JULCX (1000000). JULCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. PACAX (4.85). JULCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.50 vs. PACAX (10.19).
| JULCX | PACAX | JULCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.598 | 0.962 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 557M | 282% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.27 | 3.51 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 4.85 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.64 | 12.14 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.50 | 10.19 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.90 | 17.41 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers