Ad is loading...
JUST vs QLC
JUST vs QLC Comparison
Open Charts JUST vs QLC
Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Eq ETF
Price$85.28
Change-$0.50 (-0.58%)
Volume$5.78K
CapitalizationN/A
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap ETF
Price$68.16
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
Volume$6.29K
CapitalizationN/A
JUST vs QLC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JUST vs. QLC commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JUST is a Hold and QLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUST has more net assets: 433M vs. QLC (367M). QLC has a higher annual dividend yield than JUST: QLC (29.769) vs JUST (26.562). JUST was incepted earlier than QLC: JUST (7 years) vs QLC (9 years). QLC has a higher turnover JUST (9.00) vs JUST (9.00).
| JUST | QLC | JUST / QLC | |
| Gain YTD | 26.562 | 29.769 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 433M | 367M | 118% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 20.00 | 45% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 1.11 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| JUST | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 86% | 15 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
JUST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JUST has been loosely correlated with TT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JUST jumps, then TT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JUST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUST | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| TT - JUST | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| CARR - JUST | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| SNPS - JUST | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| LRCX - JUST | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| TER - JUST | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
More | ||||
QLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLC has been closely correlated with SQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLC jumps, then SQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLC | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| SQ - QLC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| LRCX - QLC | 66% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| HUBB - QLC | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| CDNS - QLC | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| KLAC - QLC | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||