Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JUST vs QLC
JUST vs QLC Comparison
Open Charts JUST vs QLC
Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Eq ETF
Price$84.41
Change-$1.22 (-1.42%)
Volume$468
Net Assets450.06M
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap ETF
Price$68.33
Change-$0.89 (-1.29%)
Volume$1.65K
Net Assets501.5M
JUST vs QLC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JUST vs. QLC commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JUST is a Buy and QLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLC has more net assets: 501M vs. JUST (450M). QLC has a higher annual dividend yield than JUST: QLC (4.454) vs JUST (3.292). JUST was incepted earlier than QLC: JUST (7 years) vs QLC (10 years). JUST (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than QLC (0.25). QLC has a higher turnover JUST (9.00) vs JUST (9.00).
| JUST | QLC | JUST / QLC | |
| Gain YTD | 3.292 | 4.454 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 450M | 501M | 90% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.25 | 80% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 16.00 | 56% |
| Yield | 1.12 | 1.00 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| JUST | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 74% | 24 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
JUST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JUST has been closely correlated with OWL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JUST jumps, then OWL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JUST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUST | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| OWL - JUST | 69% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| SOFI - JUST | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| TT - JUST | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| TFC - JUST | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| VNT - JUST | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
More | ||||
QLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLC has been closely correlated with WAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLC jumps, then WAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLC | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| WAB - QLC | 80% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| CRBG - QLC | 77% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| ZBRA - QLC | 75% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| FLEX - QLC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| SYF - QLC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
More | ||||