Ad is loading...
JVMAX vs NMAVX
JVMAX vs NMAVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMAX vs NMAVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap A
Price$24.17
Change+$0.40 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.84B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Investor
Price$11.39
Change+$0.11 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets549.59M
JVMAX vs NMAVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMAX vs. NMAVX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMAX is a Buy and NMAVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMAX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. NMAVX (550M). NMAVX pays higher dividends than JVMAX: NMAVX (3.39) vs JVMAX (0.61). JVMAX was incepted earlier than NMAVX: JVMAX (28 years) vs NMAVX (11 years). NMAVX (1.24) is less costly to investors than JVMAX (1.13). NMAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. JVMAX (47.00). JVMAX (5%) and NMAVX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. JVMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAVX: JVMAX (1000) vs NMAVX (2500). NMAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.78 vs. JVMAX (-11.62). JVMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.79 vs. NMAVX (4.42).
| JVMAX | NMAVX | JVMAX / NMAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.19 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.24 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.491 | -6.858 | 95% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8B | 550M | 3,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 3.39 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.62 | -5.78 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.75 | -13.45 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.79 | 4.42 | 1,148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.78 | 20.23 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers