Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMAX vs NMAVX
JVMAX vs NMAVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMAX vs NMAVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap A
Price$27.48
Change+$0.08 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.58B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Investor
Price$12.12
Change-$0.04 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets503.93M
JVMAX vs NMAVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMAX vs. NMAVX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMAX is a Buy and NMAVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMAX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. NMAVX (504M). NMAVX pays higher dividends than JVMAX: NMAVX (2.39) vs JVMAX (0.58). JVMAX was incepted earlier than NMAVX: JVMAX (28 years) vs NMAVX (12 years). NMAVX (1.24) is less costly to investors than JVMAX (1.13). NMAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. JVMAX (49.00). JVMAX (5%) and NMAVX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. JVMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAVX: JVMAX (1000) vs NMAVX (2500). JVMAX (-2.24) and NMAVX (-2.28) have marching annual gain over last year. JVMAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.58 vs. NMAVX (3.45).
| JVMAX | NMAVX | JVMAX / NMAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.19 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.24 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.789 | 0.583 | 1,336% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 504M | 4,484% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 2.39 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.24 | -2.28 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.34 | 0.70 | 3,210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.58 | 3.45 | 1,554% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.47 | 28.99 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement