Ad is loading...
JVMAX vs NMAVX
JVMAX vs NMAVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMAX vs NMAVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap A
Price$23.97
Change-$1.42 (-5.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.35B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Investor
Price$11.32
Change-$0.37 (-3.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets584.99M
JVMAX vs NMAVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMAX vs. NMAVX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMAX is a Hold and NMAVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMAX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. NMAVX (585M). NMAVX pays higher dividends than JVMAX: NMAVX (3.39) vs JVMAX (0.61). JVMAX was incepted earlier than NMAVX: JVMAX (28 years) vs NMAVX (11 years). NMAVX (1.24) is less costly to investors than JVMAX (1.13). NMAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. JVMAX (47.00). JVMAX (5%) and NMAVX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. JVMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAVX: JVMAX (1000) vs NMAVX (2500). NMAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.44 vs. JVMAX (-8.70). JVMAX return over 5 years is better than : 86.30 vs. NMAVX (19.97).
| JVMAX | NMAVX | JVMAX / NMAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.19 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.24 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.118 | -3.473 | 3% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.4B | 585M | 3,658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 3.39 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.70 | -2.44 | 357% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.01 | -11.65 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.30 | 19.97 | 432% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.82 | 24.36 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...