Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCCX
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.02
Change+$0.13 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.11B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$30.67
Change+$0.14 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.1B vs. LMCCX (1.13B). JVMCX (0.00) and LMCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCCX (28 years). JVMCX (1.86) and LMCCX (1.78) have similar cost to investors . LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX (1000) and LMCCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.65 vs. LMCCX (-8.84). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.10 vs. LMCCX (30.57).
| JVMCX | LMCCX | JVMCX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.78 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.78 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.237 | 0.362 | 2,831% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.1B | 1.13B | 2,133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.65 | -8.84 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.82 | 20.63 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.10 | 30.57 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.81 | 29.71 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement