Ad is loading...
JVMCX vs LMCCX
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$23.08
Change-$0.27 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.66B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$27.05
Change-$0.29 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCCX commentary
Apr 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and LMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 19.7B vs. LMCCX (1.02B). JVMCX (0.00) and LMCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCCX (28 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCCX (1.78). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. LMCCX (41.00). JVMCX (1000) and LMCCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LMCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.74 vs. JVMCX (-11.95). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.63 vs. LMCCX (35.95).
| JVMCX | LMCCX | JVMCX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.78 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.78 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.708 | -10.125 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.7B | 1.02B | 1,931% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.95 | -10.74 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.41 | -9.10 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.63 | 35.95 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.70 | 10.46 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers