Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCCX
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.03
Change+$0.25 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.45B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$29.48
Change+$0.23 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. LMCCX (1.08B). JVMCX (0.00) and LMCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCCX (28 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCCX (1.78). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). JVMCX (1000) and LMCCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.66 vs. LMCCX (-6.58). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.39 vs. LMCCX (23.05).
| JVMCX | LMCCX | JVMCX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.78 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.78 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.897 | -3.846 | -49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 1.08B | 2,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.66 | -6.58 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | -0.68 | -217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.39 | 23.05 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.96 | 18.27 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement