Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCCX
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.48B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$29.85
Change-$0.13 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and LMCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. LMCCX (1.09B). JVMCX (0.00) and LMCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCCX (29 years). JVMCX (1.86) and LMCCX (1.77) have similar cost to investors . LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX (1000) and LMCCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.96 vs. LMCCX (-13.23). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.91 vs. LMCCX (18.19).
| JVMCX | LMCCX | JVMCX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.77 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.77 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.877 | -1.446 | -475% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5B | 1.09B | 2,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.96 | -13.23 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.36 | 7.91 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.91 | 18.19 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.70 | 27.53 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement