Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCCX
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.40
Change+$0.14 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.6B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$30.56
Change+$0.13 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCCX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. LMCCX (1.11B). JVMCX (0.00) and LMCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCCX (28 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCCX (1.78). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX (1000) and LMCCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.34 vs. LMCCX (-2.15). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.69 vs. LMCCX (39.29).
| JVMCX | LMCCX | JVMCX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.78 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.78 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.747 | 0.033 | 23,566% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 1.11B | 2,036% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.34 | -2.15 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.85 | 17.14 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.69 | 39.29 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.04 | 22.85 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement