Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCFX
JVMCX vs LMCFX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCFX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.44B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$33.65
Change-$0.13 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMCX vs LMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.4B vs. LMCFX (1.13B). LMCFX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCFX (0.69) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCFX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCFX (18 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LMCFX (0.88). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCFX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.68 vs. LMCFX (-5.60). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.14 vs. LMCFX (41.29).
| JVMCX | LMCFX | JVMCX / LMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.88 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.88 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.818 | 1.198 | 986% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.4B | 1.13B | 2,152% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.69 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.68 | -5.60 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.38 | 20.17 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.14 | 41.29 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.98 | 45.36 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement