Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCFX
JVMCX vs LMCFX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCFX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.22
Change-$0.18 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.88B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$32.52
Change-$0.28 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
JVMCX vs LMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCFX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. LMCFX (1.09B). LMCFX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCFX (0.77) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCFX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCFX (18 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCFX (0.88). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCFX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.93 vs. LMCFX (-2.83). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.59 vs. LMCFX (48.53).
| JVMCX | LMCFX | JVMCX / LMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.88 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.88 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.348 | -1.738 | -250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.9B | 1.09B | 2,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.77 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.93 | -2.83 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.70 | 17.01 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.59 | 48.53 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.68 | 30.65 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement