Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCRX
JVMCX vs LMCRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.50
Change+$0.17 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.92B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R3
Price$34.00
Change+$0.30 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
JVMCX vs LMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCRX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. LMCRX (1.12B). LMCRX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCRX (0.32) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCRX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCRX (17 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCRX (1.28). LMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCRX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.09 vs. LMCRX (-3.34). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.02 vs. LMCRX (40.78).
| JVMCX | LMCRX | JVMCX / LMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.28 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.28 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.024 | 1.140 | 704% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.9B | 1.12B | 2,052% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.09 | -3.34 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.11 | 17.76 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.02 | 40.78 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.53 | 34.60 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement