Ad is loading...
JVMCX vs LMCSX
JVMCX vs LMCSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$23.60
Change+$0.21 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.68B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
Price$30.55
Change+$0.33 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
JVMCX vs LMCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 19.7B vs. LMCSX (1.02B). LMCSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCSX (0.58) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCSX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCSX (10 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCSX (1.03). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. LMCSX (41.00). LMCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). LMCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.87 vs. JVMCX (-13.08). JVMCX (45.85) and LMCSX (45.16) have equivalent 5 years return.
| JVMCX | LMCSX | JVMCX / LMCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.03 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.03 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.549 | -10.166 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.7B | 1.02B | 1,937% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.08 | -10.87 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.01 | -3.62 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.85 | 45.16 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers