Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCSX
JVMCX vs LMCSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.03
Change+$0.25 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.45B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
Price$32.71
Change+$0.26 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
JVMCX vs LMCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. LMCSX (1.08B). LMCSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCSX (0.58) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCSX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCSX (10 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCSX (1.03). LMCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). LMCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.66 vs. LMCSX (-5.08). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.39 vs. LMCSX (29.59).
| JVMCX | LMCSX | JVMCX / LMCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.03 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.03 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.897 | -3.537 | -54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 1.08B | 2,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.66 | -5.08 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | 3.18 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.39 | 29.59 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers