Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCSX
JVMCX vs LMCSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.54
Change+$0.20 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.92B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
Price$34.10
Change+$0.18 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
JVMCX vs LMCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCSX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. LMCSX (1.11B). LMCSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCSX (0.56) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCSX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCSX (10 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCSX (1.03). LMCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.55 vs. LMCSX (-3.80). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.08 vs. LMCSX (41.85).
| JVMCX | LMCSX | JVMCX / LMCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.03 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.03 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.063 | 0.832 | 969% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.9B | 1.11B | 2,061% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.55 | -3.80 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.76 | 18.39 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.08 | 41.85 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.72 | 36.23 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers