Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NCAVX
JVMCX vs NCAVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NCAVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.48B
Nuance Concentrated Value Investor
Price$11.93
Change-$0.09 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.19M
JVMCX vs NCAVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NCAVX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NCAVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. NCAVX (60.2M). NCAVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NCAVX (1.06) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NCAVX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NCAVX (13 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NCAVX (1.36). NCAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NCAVX: JVMCX (1000) vs NCAVX (2500). NCAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.57 vs. JVMCX (-7.96). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.91 vs. NCAVX (-12.24).
| JVMCX | NCAVX | JVMCX / NCAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.29 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.36 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.877 | -1.845 | -373% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5B | 60.2M | 39,037% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.96 | -6.57 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.36 | -4.46 | -210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.91 | -12.24 | -220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.70 | -0.26 | -12,673% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement